The Mentor: Chinese Rugs, Vol. 4, Num. 2, Serial No. 102, March 1, 1916 — John Shaqi
The Mentor: Chinese Rugs, Vol. 4, Num. 2, Serial No. 102, March 1, 1916Mumford, John Kimberly
History
The Mentor: Chinese Rugs, Vol. 4, Num. 2, Serial No. 102, March 1, 1916
Mumford, John Kimberly
Rugs, Oriental
This attractive rug is representative of a very admirable class of
Chinese floor fabrics, and illustrates in the clearest manner some
interesting and important features in the rug weaving art of China.
The knottage, as will be learned from the specification above, is
not great. A Mohammedan sedjadeh with only 42 knots to the square
inch would be held of small merit, unless it came from one of two or
three districts in Asia Minor--Bergamo for example, or else had some
individual element of value, such as great age, phenomenal color, or
uncommon design. In China, however, as has been pointed out in the
accompanying text, high textures are not accounted of large importance.
This rug is not of great antiquity, nor yet is it of very recent
manufacture. It might with safety be attributed to the Kien Lung
time, or some reign immediately thereafter. The best artistic tenets
of Persia--so far as they appertain to rug weaving--have been
conscientiously followed. The Mohammedan influence is not difficult
to trace, and yet at no time can a foreign or vagrant note be
discovered. The rug is thoroughly Chinese, not only in spirit but in
every detail. It will bear careful study in the light of what has
been said regarding the absorbent and adaptive quality of Chinese art
in all ages. The border area is relatively narrow, wherein marked
deference is paid to the oldest and best Chinese standards, and for
all a distinctly floral character prevails, the utmost simplicity is
maintained. It is a notably consistent rug. There is perfect harmony
between border and center, and the most perfect manifestation of the
Chinese artistic sense, perhaps, lies in the fact that, to the end of
preserving simplicity and balance, the weaver has carefully refrained
from “cluttering up” the border section with “guard stripes” requiring
additional patterns, which in a rug of this character would have been
superfluous and therefore disturbing.
Throughout the field of the rug, despite a decidedly ornate touch,
there is still a careful avoidance of excess. Only two elements
appear--the emblematic butterfly and floral devices, which not only
are combined to form the fine medallion, but which, with the utmost
refinement of handling, suffice for all the secondary and tertiary
constituents of the design.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account