The Mentor: Chinese Rugs, Vol. 4, Num. 2, Serial No. 102, March 1, 1916Mumford, John Kimberly
History
The Mentor: Chinese Rugs, Vol. 4, Num. 2, Serial No. 102, March 1, 1916
Mumford, John Kimberly
Rugs, Oriental
Referring again to the fidelity with which the Persian theory has been
followed, observe that the design works out from a mathematically
precise central point, and is built in all directions with perfect
equality. Every figure has its exact counterpart on the opposite side;
side or end, the balance is preserved even to the corner patterns.
Given such impeccable skill in the adjustment of the design, there
remains only one test point; namely, the distribution of color. Observe
in this regard with what nicety the dainty touches of light and dark
blue are balanced against one another, from the central medallion
outward; and also how the little note of irregularity which is held
of such vital importance by the superstitious Persian, even in his
greatest masterpieces, is struck here by employing blue in some of the
smaller field devices, butterflies and flowers alike, and omitting it
from the corresponding figures at the opposite side.
Herein lies the human charm in the old weaving of Asia, the touch which
makes us know the ancient weaver and his thought, across the space of
lifetimes.
PREPARED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OF THE MENTOR ASSOCIATION
ILLUSTRATION FOR THE MENTOR, VOL. 4, No. 2, SERIAL No. 102
COPYRIGHT, 1916, BY THE MENTOR ASSOCIATION, INC.
[Illustration: PLATE II
ANTIQUE CHINESE RUG]
CHINESE RUGS
ANTIQUE CHINESE RUG
Monograph Number Two in The Mentor Reading Course
Length, eight feet ten inches.
Width, five feet seven inches.
Thirty hand-tied knots to the square inch.
The student should compare this rug, in all its details, with that
reproduced in Plate I, the property of Mr. Carll Tucker. The two
fabrics belong practically to the same school, and are not widely
separated in period. They have many points in common. Those in which
they do not agree are the more important. For many reasons I am
inclined to accord the honors to the other rug on the score of age.
This piece (Plate II) is in some ways superior in point of color. In
treatment, in concept, in artistry, it is not the equal of the rug in
Plate I, and yet to look at, it would by most people be considered more
beautiful. This is probably due almost wholly to coloring. Something
has been said in the accompanying text regarding the yellowish cast
given to Chinese reds, and the manner in which the peach and apricot
shades are produced by dyeing loose red over fast yellow. The rug in
Plate I is an illustration of that trick in dyeing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account