The Mentor: Julius Cæsar, Vol. 6, Num. 2, Serial No. 150, March 1, 1918Botsford, George Willis
History
The Mentor: Julius Cæsar, Vol. 6, Num. 2, Serial No. 150, March 1, 1918
Botsford, George Willis
Caesar, Julius; Rome -- History -- Republic, 265-30 B.C.
The assassination left Antony sole consul. Having control of Cæsar’s
papers and property, he skilfully used these advantages to make himself
absolute. In a clever oration at the funeral he turned the feelings of
the populace against the murderers, who thereupon fled from Rome. With
young Octavianus (Octavius) he patched up a temporary alliance, and in
combination they defeated the armies of Brutus and Cassius in the two
battles of Philippi, 42 B. C. The beaten generals committed suicide,
and the victors divided the empire between them, Antony taking the
East and Octavianus the West. The later history of Antony is told in
connection with Cleopatra.
PREPARED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OF THE MENTOR ASSOCIATION
ILLUSTRATION FOR THE MENTOR, VOL. 6. No. 2, SERIAL No. 150
COPYRIGHT, 1918, BY THE MENTOR ASSOCIATION, INC.
[Illustration: RUINS OF THE TEMPLE OF THE DEIFIED JULIUS CÆSAR--ROMAN
FORUM]
_JULIUS CÆSAR_
_The Portrait Sculpture and the Reproduction of Buildings in this
Number of The Mentor_
SIX
In the Rome of Cæsar Hellenic influence was active, not only in
literature and philosophy, but also in art. The Roman portrait
sculpture of this period reveals Greek knowledge and skill; but its
essential character was determined by native tradition. The earliest
Roman portraits were waxen death masks formed from a moulding over
the face. Hence they were mechanically accurate but utterly devoid
of animation. Though this material has perished, the visitor to the
museums of Rome will find in relief many a family group in which
the faces retain the mask-like quality. Only in a slighter degree
does the principle apply to portrait sculpture in the round. At
its best the Republican face accordingly is intensely realistic
yet with no intimation of the inner spirit. Commonly the hair is
indicated by parallel scratches made by firm chisel strokes. By these
characteristics many busts and statues may be easily dated. It should
be noticed, too, that in the Republican age the portrait heads, as
distinguished from statues, include in addition to the head scarcely
more than the neck, and that the bust is a gradual development during
the subsequent period. With this criterion we are able to assign the
Brutus of this number of The Mentor to the administration of Claudius,
41-54 A. D. In the colossal portrait of Cæsar of the National Museum
at Naples the bust is a modern restoration, and we may only cherish
the reasonable faith that the head is genuine, though somewhat later
than his lifetime. The famous Cæsar of the British Museum, comprising
head and neck, would satisfy the criterion here formulated, but fails
to pass another even more important test. The indication of the
pupil in the eye was not devised till after Hadrian, 117-138 A. D.,
and accordingly this head could be no earlier. Recently it has been
suggested, with some reason, that the work is a modern study. If so, it
is a great success, as it most admirably expresses the physique and the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account