The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefsSmith, Grafton Elliot
History
The migrations of early culture: A study of the significance of the geographical distribution of the practice of mummification as evidence of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs
Smith, Grafton Elliot
Ethnology; Human beings -- Migrations; Mummies
The peculiarly Mediterranean modifications also spread east and it seems
most likely that in this case the route from Syria down the Euphrates to
the Persian Gulf was taken.
[Since this has been in print further investigation has elucidated with
remarkable precision the ways and means of, as well as the impelling
motives for, the great migration to the East. This calls for some
modification of the foregoing (as well as many of the subsequent)
paragraphs. It has been seen that the great wave of culture carried
east and west from Egypt the distinctive method of embalming that came
into full use somewhere about 900 B.C.; hence it is probable the eighth
century B.C. witnessed the commencement of the series of expeditions,
which probably extended over many centuries. It can be no mere chance
that the period indicated coincides with the time when the Phœnicians
were embarking upon maritime enterprises on a much greater and more
daring scale than the world had known until then, in the Mediterranean
and Atlantic, in the Red Sea and beyond. In the course of their trading
expeditions to the Bab-el-Mandeb these Levantine mariners brought to that
region a fuller knowledge of the customs and practices of Egypt and of
the whole Phœnician world in the Mediterranean. It was probably in this
way and not by the Euphrates route that the culture of the Levant reached
the Persian Gulf and India.
The easterly migration of culture which set out from the region of the
Bab-el-Mandeb conveyed not only the Ethiopian modifications of Egyptian
practices, but also the Egyptian and Mediterranean contributions which
the Phœnicians had brought to Ethiopia. On some future occasion I shall
discuss the important part played by the Phœnicians in these expeditions
to the Far East.]
It is unfortunate that practically nothing is known of the practice
of mummification on the Southern coast of Arabia. Bent tells us that
the Southern Arabians preserved their dead. Moreover, as the Egyptians
obtained from Sabæa much of the materials used for embalming, it is
not unlikely that the Arabs may also have learned the use of these
preservatives.
In support of this suggestion I might refer to the evidence from
Madagascar. It is well known that this island was colonised in ancient
times by people from the neighbourhood of the Bab-el-Mandeb, probably
Galla-people from the Somali coast as well as Sabæans from the Arabian
coast, possibly ferried along the African shore by expert mariners from
Oman and the Persian Gulf, either the Phœnicians themselves or their
kinsmen. A more numerous element came from the distant Malay Archipelago.
Either or both of these racial elements may have introduced the practice
of mummification into Madagascar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account