The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
In drawing inferences from social distinctions, the same point of view
is frequently held. It is assumed, that, as the mental development of
the white race is the highest, it also has the highest aptitude in this
direction, and therefore its mind is supposed to have the most subtile
organization. As the ultimate psychical causes are not so apparent as
anatomical characteristics, the judgment of the mental status of a
people is generally guided by the difference between its social status
and our own: the greater the difference between their intellectual,
emotional, and moral processes and those which are found in our
civilization, the harsher the judgment on the people. It is only when a
Tacitus finds the virtues of past stages of the life of his own people
among foreign tribes that their example is held up to the gaze of his
fellow-citizens, who probably had a pitying smile for the dreamer who
clung to the ideas of a time which they had left far behind.
In order to understand clearly the relations between race and
civilization, the two unproved assumptions to which I have referred must
be subjected to a searching analysis. We must investigate in how far we
are justified in assuming that achievement is primarily due to
exceptional aptitude, and in how far we are justified in assuming that
the European type—or, taking the notion in its extreme form, that the
North European type—represents the highest development of mankind. It
will be advantageous to clear up these points before we take up the
detailed inquiry.
In regard to the former point, it might be said, that, although
achievement is not necessarily a measure of aptitude, it seems
admissible to judge the one by the other. Have not most races had the
same chances for development? Why, then, did the white race alone
develop a civilization which is sweeping the whole world, and compared
to which all other civilizations appear as feeble beginnings cut short
in early childhood, or arrested and petrified in an early stage of
development? Is it not, to say the least, probable that the race which
attained the highest stage of civilization was the most gifted one, and
that those races which remained at the bottom of the scale were not
capable of rising to higher levels?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account