The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911Boas, Franz
Science
The mind of primitive man : $b A course of lectures delivered before the Lowell Institute, Boston, Mass., and the National University of Mexico, 1910-1911
Boas, Franz
Ethnopsychology; Race
In order to find an answer to these questions, let us consider briefly
the general outlines of the history of civilization; let our minds go
back a few thousand years, until we reach the time when the
civilizations of eastern and of western Asia were in their infancy. As
time passed on, these civilizations were transferred from one people to
another; some of those who had represented the highest type of culture
sinking back into obscurity, while others took their places. During the
dawn of history we see civilization cling to certain districts, in which
it is taken up, now by one people, now by another. In the numerous
conflicts of these times the more civilized people were often
vanquished. The conqueror, however, learned the arts of life from the
conquered, and carried on the work of civilization. Thus the centres of
civilization were shifting to and fro over a limited area, and progress
was slow and halting. At the same period the ancestors of the races that
are now among the most highly civilized were in no way superior to
primitive man as we find him now in regions that have not come into
contact with modern civilization.
Was the civilization attained by these ancient people of such character
as to allow us to claim for them a genius superior to that of any other
race?
First of all, we must bear in mind that none of these civilizations was
the product of the genius of a single people. Ideas and inventions were
carried from one to the other; and, although intercommunication was
slow, each people which participated in the ancient development
contributed its share to the general progress. Proofs without number
have been forthcoming which show that ideas have been disseminated as
long as people have come into contact with one another, and that neither
race nor language nor distance limits their diffusion. As all have
worked together in the development of the ancient civilizations, we must
bow to the genius of all, whatever group of mankind they may
represent,—Hamitic, Semitic, Aryan, or Mongol.
We may now ask, Did no other races develop a culture of equal value? It
would seem that the civilizations of ancient Peru and of Central America
may well be compared with the ancient civilizations of the Old World. In
both we find a high stage of political organization: we find division of
labor and an elaborate ecclesiastical organization. Great architectural
works were undertaken, requiring the co-operation of many individuals.
Animals and plants were domesticated, and the art of writing had been
invented. The inventions and knowledge of the peoples of the Old World
seem to have been somewhat more numerous and extended than those of the
races of the New World, but there can be no doubt that the general
status of their civilization was nearly equally high.[1] This will
suffice for our consideration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account