[41] M. C., c. 17, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 12. [42] M. C., cc. 18, 19, 1st Ch. Hen. III., cc. 13, 14. [43] M. C., cc. 20, 21, 22, 1st Ch. Hen. III., cc. 15, 16, 17. [44] M. C., c. 23, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 18. [45] M. C., c. 24, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 19. [46] M. C., c. 29, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 22. [47] M. C., c. 31, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 24. [48] M. C., c. 32, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 25. [49] M. C., c. 33, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 26. [50] M. C., c. 34, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 27. [51] M. C., c. 36, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 29. [52] M. C., c. 37, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 30. [53] M. C., c. 35, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 28. [54] M. C., c. 38, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 31. [55] M. C., c. 39, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 32. [56] M. C., c. 40, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 33. [57] M. C., c. 43, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 35. [58] M. C., c. 44, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 36. [59] M. C., c. 46, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 37. [60] M. C., c. 54, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 39. [61] M. C., c. 47, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 38. [62] M. C., c. 56, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 40. [63] M. C., c. 13, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 10. [64] M. C., c. 28, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 21. [65] M. C., c. 30, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 23. [66] M. C., c. 41, 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 34. [67] M. C., cc. 10, 11, 48, 43, 50, 52, 55, 57, 45. [68] M. C., cc. 25, 27, 42. [69] M. C., cc. 12, 14. [70] M. C., c. 15. [71] 1st Ch. Hen. III., c. 41. [72] M. C., cc. 49, 58, 59. [73] 1st Charter of Henry III., c. 42; _Statutes of the Realm--Charters of Liberties_, pp. 14–16. [74] W. Cov., vol. ii. p. 233. [75] R. Wend., vol. iv. p. 3. [76] _Ib._ pp. 3, 4. [77] W. Cov., vol. ii. p. 232. The words are “Hiis diebus, antequam de obitu regis mentio fieret, impetraverunt qui apud Dovram obsessi erant inducias usque post Pascha, et soluta est obsidio”; but the more detailed accounts in our other authorities clearly show that though hostilities were suspended before John’s death, the siege was not actually raised till the beginning of November. Mr. G. J. Turner appears to have overlooked this fact when he wrote that Hubert’s absence from the coronation “excites some suspicion concerning his loyalty” (“Minority of Henry III.,” part I., _Trans. Roy. Hist. Soc._, 2nd Series, vol. xviii., p. 246). It was precisely Hubert’s loyalty which made it impossible for him to leave Dover till his truce with Louis was prolonged and the siege raised. [78] R. Wend., vol. iv. p. 4. Cf. _Hist. Ducs_, p. 182: “Grant doute avoient” [the king’s friends] “de Looys, qui se partit tost de Douvre apries chou que la trive fu prise entre lui et cels dedens, si s’en vint à Londres.” [79] R. Wend., vol. iv. p. 4. [80] For Newark and Lincoln see _Hist. Ducs_, p. 181; for Sleaford see below, p. 25.