The Mirror of Taste, and Dramatic Censor, Vol. I, No. 5, May 1810 — John Shaqi
The Mirror of Taste, and Dramatic Censor, Vol. I, No. 5, May 1810
History
The Mirror of Taste, and Dramatic Censor, Vol. I, No. 5, May 1810
Drama -- Periodicals; Theater -- Periodicals
Of the alterations introduced by this reformer of Shakspeare, the first
and most obvious is the change of the catastrophe. King Lear and
Cordelia, instead of dying as in the original, are finally triumphant,
and _live very happy after_. Here is improvement, here is poetical
justice, here is every thing that can be desired to the perfection of a
drama. "Since all reasonable beings," says doctor Johnson, "naturally
love justice, I cannot easily be persuaded, that the observation of
justice makes a play worse; or that, if other excellencies are equal,
the audience will not always rise better pleased from the final triumph
of persecuted virtue." This reasoning is just; but the critic has
unfortunately advanced a sentence, which must be a perpetual
stumbling-block to every advocate of Tate, viz. "_if other excellencies
are equal_," &c. Had Shakspeare chosen, according to the "faith of
chronicles," to represent Cordelia triumphant; had he adorned the scenes
of poetical justice with his peculiar spirit, and nature, and poetry;
then indeed the excellencies of the drama, though different in kind,
would probably have been equal in magnitude: though I think it very
doubtful, whether even then the change of the catastrophe would not have
been a deformity, rather than an improvement. Unquestionably our
affection for persecuted virtue is strengthened by the very distresses
in which it is involved. The triumph of Cordelia would certainly draw
from us an instantaneous acknowledgment of satisfaction: but the
impression could not be lasting; while her fall is fixed more deeply on
the attention, and raises a more permanent feeling of pity for her
sufferings, and indignation against her persecutors. Shakspeare must
have thought so, when he chose, in violation of the truth of history, to
deprive her of poetical justice. To conclude the question relative to
the catastrophe, it is utterly impossible that the mind of Lear should
be capable of surviving so violent a change of circumstances. In the
original, he is very naturally represented by Shakspeare as bending
under the weight of his calamities, and expiring of a broken heart.
"_Enter Lear, with Cordelia dead in his arms._
"_Lear._ Howl, howl, howl, howl!--O, you are men of stones;
Had I your tongues and eyes, I'd use them so
That heaven's vault should crack:--O, she is gone forever!--
I know, when one is dead, and when one lives;
She's dead as earth.----
"Cordelia, Cordelia, stay a little. Ha!
What is't thou says't?--Her voice was ever soft,
Gentle, and low; an excellent thing in woman:--
I kill'd the slave that was a hanging thee.
And my poor fool is hang'd! No, no, no life:
Why should a dog, a horse, a rat have life,
And thou no breath at all? O, thou wilt come no more,
Never, never, never, never, never!--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account