The Modes of Ancient Greek MusicMonro, D. B. (David Binning)
History
The Modes of Ancient Greek Music
Monro, D. B. (David Binning)
Music, Greek and Roman
The most characteristic feature of this scale, in contrast to those
of the modern Major and Minor, is the place of the small intervals
(semitone or [Greek: pyknon]), which are always the lowest intervals
of a tetrachord. It is hardly necessary to quote passages from
Aristotle and Aristoxenus to show that this is the succession of
intervals assumed by them. The question is asked in the Aristotelian
_Problems_ (xix. 4), why Parhypatê is difficult to sing, while Hypatê
is easy, although there is only a diesis between them ([Greek: kaitoi
diesis hekateras]). Again (_Probl._ xix. 47), speaking of the old
heptachord scale, the writer says that the Paramesê was left out, and
consequently the Mesê became the lowest note of the upper [Greek:
pyknon], _i.e._ the group of 'close' notes consisting of Mesê, Tritê,
and Paranêtê. Similarly Aristoxenus (_Harm._ p. 23) observes that the
'space' of the Lichanos, _i.e._ the limit within which it varies in
the different genera, is a tone while the space of the Parhypatê is
only a diesis, for it is never nearer Hypatê than a diesis or further
off than a semitone.
§ 17. _Earlier Heptachord Scales._
Regarding the earlier seven-stringed scales which preceded this
octave our information is scanty and somewhat obscure. The chief
notice on the subject is the following passage of the Aristotelian
_Problems_:
_Probl._ xix. 47 [Greek: dia ti hoi archaioi heptachordous
poiountes tas harmonias tên hypatên all' ou tên nêtên
katelipon: hê ou tên] [Greek: hypatên] (leg. [Greek: nêtên]),
[Greek: alla tên nyn paramesên kaloumenên aphêroun kai to
toniaion diastêma; echrônto de tê eschatê mesê tou epi to oxy
pyknou; did kai mesên autên prosêloreusan [hê] oti ên tou men
anô tetrachordon teleutê, tou de katô archê, kai meson eiche
logon tonô tôn akrôn?]
'Why did the ancient seven-stringed scales include Hypatê but
not Nêtê? Or should we say that the note omitted was not Nêtê,
but the present Paramesê and the interval of a tone (_i.e._
the disjunctive tone)? The Mesê, then, was the lowest note of
the upper [Greek: pyknon]: whence the name [Greek: mesê],
because it was the end of the upper tetrachord and beginning
of the lower one, and was in pitch the middle between the
extremes.'
This clearly implies two conjunct tetrachords--
[Music: _e f g a a# c d_ \---- /\----- /]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account