Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Finance -- Great Britain
The year 1824 was notable for a very great increase in the number of
joint-stock companies which were promoted or suggested, and also of
loans to foreign countries; and a period of intense excitement and
speculation ensued. This was followed by the inevitable crisis, which
developed into a panic at the end of 1825, when a large number of
London and country bankers had to stop payment. The reserve of the
Bank was reduced to a merely nominal figure, and the Bank authorities
themselves suggested that they should again be “restricted” as to
payments; but the suggestion was firmly resisted by the Government.
Fortunately, at the lucky moment, an old box which had been stored
away was remembered. It contained a large quantity of £1 notes, and
these the Bank at once commenced to issue. This issue had very quick
and beneficial results. The notes were readily received by the public
in exchange for the notes of private bankers, the demand for bullion
ceased; and Mr. Harman, giving his evidence before a parliamentary
committee inquiring into the causes of the panic, stated it was his
opinion that this issue of small notes “saved the credit of the
country.”
In 1826 the Bank of England, by arrangement with the Government,
agreed to establish branches in various parts of the country, and gave
up their monopoly of joint-stock banking, except within a radius of
sixty-five miles of London.
The year 1833, however, saw a further restriction in the powers of
the Bank, when, after protracted negotiations, and in return for a
further renewal of its Charter, the Bank surrendered its monopoly of
joint-stock banking entirely, provided that no bank having more than
six partners might issue notes within the sixty-five-mile limit of
London.
It is a curious point that the Charter of the Bank never did restrict
joint-stock banking in its present accepted form, but only _the
issue of notes_ by joint-stock bankers or banks having more than
six partners. Up to this time the issue of notes by a bank had been
thought to be its main business; so much so, that it was believed to
be useless to attempt to conduct a bank without power of issue, and
consequently no joint-stock bank had been founded. But about this
time the need of such institutions began to be felt, and the presumed
monopoly of the Bank of England was called in question—largely by Mr.
Gilbart, the founder of the London and Westminster Bank. The Bank tried
to assert their monopoly, but without success, and in order to settle
the matter effectually, the following clause was inserted in the Act
passed in 1833 dealing with the Bank Charter:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account