At first of course there was a brief period of confusion, some burning,
pillaging, massacring; but this was soon checked by the Arab governors.
When things had settled down again, the subject populations found
themselves at least no worse off than before, and they shortly began to
perceive that they had benefited by the change of rulers. They were
permitted to retain their own laws and judges; governors of their own
race administered the districts, collected the taxes, and determined
such differences as arose amongst themselves. The citizen classes,
instead of bearing the whole burden of the State expenditure, had only
to pay a poll-tax of no very exacting amount, and they were free of all
obligations; unless they held cultivable land, in which case they paid
the _Kharaj_ or land-tax as well. The poll-tax was graduated according
to the rank of the payer, from twelve to forty-eight _dirhems_ a year,
or from about three to twelve pounds at our present purchasing power of
money; and its collection in twelve monthly instalments made it the
easier to meet. The poll-tax was an impost upon heresy; it was levied
only upon Christians and Jews: the land-tax, on the other hand, which
varied according to the productiveness of the soil, was assessed
equally on Christians, Jews, and Moslems. As a rule the old proprietors
and cities preserved their property as before the conquest. The lands of
the Church, indeed, and of those landowners who had fled to the
mountains of the north, were confiscated, but even then their serfs were
left upon them as cultivators, and were only required to pay a certain
proportion, varying from a third to four-fifths, of the produce, to
their new Moslem lords. Sometimes the cities, such as Merida and
Orihuela, had been able to obtain exceptionally favourable terms from
the conquerors, and were suffered to retain their goods and lands upon
the payment of a fixed tribute. At the worst, beyond the poll-tax, the
Christians were in no way subject to heavier exactions than their Moslem
neighbours. They had even gained a right which had never been permitted
them by the Gothic kings: they could alienate their lands.[7] In
religious toleration they had nothing to regret. Instead of persecuting
them, and forcing upon them a compulsory conversion, as the Goths had
upon the Jews, the Arabs left them free to worship whom or what they
pleased; and so valuable was the poll-tax to the treasury, that the
Sultans of Cordova were much more disposed to discourage than to welcome
any considerable missionary fervour that might deprive the State of so
useful a source of revenue. The result was that the Christians were
satisfied with the new _régime_, and openly admitted that they preferred
the rule of the Moors to that of the Franks or Goths. Even their
priests, who had lost most of all, were at first but little incensed
with the change, as the old chronicle, ascribed to Isidore of Beja,
written at Cordova in 754, shows.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account