The good monk is not even scandalized
at so unholy an alliance as the marriage between Roderick's widow and
the son of Mūsa. But the best proof of the satisfaction of the
Christians with their new rulers is the fact that there was not a single
religious revolt during the eighth century.
Above all, the slaves, who had been cruelly ill-used by the Goths and
Romans, had cause to congratulate themselves upon the change. Slavery is
a very mild and humane institution in the hands of a good Mohammedan.
The Arabian Prophet, while unable to do away with an ancient
institution, which was nevertheless repugnant to the socialistic
principles of Islam, did his utmost to soften the rigours of slavery.
"God," said he, "hath ordained that your brothers should be your slaves:
therefore him whom God hath ordained to be the slave of his brother, his
brother must give him of the food which he eateth himself, and of the
clothes wherewith he clotheth himself, and not order him to do anything
beyond his power.... A man who ill-treats his slave will not enter into
Paradise." There is no more commendable action in Mohammedan morals than
to free slaves, and such enfranchisement is enjoined by the Prophet
especially as an atonement for an undeserved blow or other injustice. In
Andalusia, the slaves upon the estates that had passed from the
Christians into the possession of Moslems were almost in the position of
small farmers; their Mohammedan masters, whose trade was war, and who
despised heartily such menial occupations as tilling the soil, left
them free to cultivate the land as they pleased, and only insisted on a
fair return of products. Slaves of Christians, instead of being
hopelessly condemned to servitude for all their lives, were now provided
with the simplest possible road to freedom: they had only to go to the
nearest Mohammedan of repute, and repeat the formula of belief, "There
is no god but God, and Mohammed is His Prophet," and they became
immediately free. Conversion to Islam thus carried with it
enfranchisement, and it is no wonder that we find the Spanish slaves
hastening to profess the new faith and thus to become free men. The
Catholic priests had taken small pains to graft the Christian religion
into their hearts; they had enough to do to look after their estates and
the souls of the nobles without troubling themselves about the spiritual
wants of the ignorant; and the change from semi-pagan, semi-Christian,
vacuity to a perhaps equally unintelligent apprehension of Islam was no
very severe wrench to the servile mind. Nor were the slaves by any means
the only converts to the new religion. Many of the large proprietors and
men of position became Mohammedans, either to avoid the poll-tax, or to
preserve their estates, or because they honestly admired the simple
grandeur of this latest presentment of theism. These converts or
renegades were destined to cause some trouble in the State, as will
presently be seen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account