settled in Murcia, which they re-christened "Misr" or Egypt; the men of
Palestine at Sidonia and Algeciras; the people of the Jordan at Regio
(Malaga), those of Damascus in Elvira (Granada), and the battalion of
Kinnesrin at Jaen.[9] From this time one of the causes of faction in
Andalusia was removed, but party spirit still ran high, and government
was often changed to anarchy, until a ruler armed with peculiar
prestige, carrying in his person the authority and blood of the Khalifs
of Damascus, came to take into his hands the sceptre of the disturbed
country and to unite for awhile all factions under the standard of the
Sultan of Cordova. This young man was the new ruler whom Charlemagne had
so unsuccessfully come to expel, and his name was Abd-er-Rahmān the
Omeyyad.
[Illustration]
[Illustration]
IV.
A YOUNG PRETENDER.
For six hundred years the greater part of the Mohammedan Empire was
nominally under the authority of a central ruler called a Khalif, a
title which signifies a "successor" or "substitute." At first this
authority was real and powerful: the Khalif appointed the governors of
all the provinces, from Spain to the borders of the Hindu Kush, and
removed any of them at his pleasure. But the empire was too large to
hold together round a central pivot for any length of time, and
gradually various local governors made themselves virtually independent,
although they generally professed the utmost devotion to the Khalif and
paid him every honour except obedience. By degrees even this show of
respect was thrown off, and dynasties arose which espoused heretical
tenets, repudiated the spiritual supremacy of the Khalif, and denounced
him and all his line as usurpers. Finally the time came when the Khalifs
were as weak in temporal authority as the Pope of Rome, and were even
kept prisoners in their palace by the mercenary body-guard they had
hired to protect them against their rebellious nobles. This took place
about three hundred years after the foundation of the Khalifate; and
for the second half of their existence the Khalifs were little more than
ciphers to be played with by the great princes of the empire and to
contribute a little pomp to their coronations. Finally the Khalifate was
abolished in Asia by the Mongol invasion in the thirteenth century, and
though the title is still claimed by the Sultan of Turkey, there is no
Khalif now in the old comprehensive sense of the word.[10]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account