The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of MankindGobineau, Arthur, comte de
Philosophy
The Moral and Intellectual Diversity of Races: With Particular Reference to Their Respective Influence in the Civil and Political History of Mankind
And yet he does not even tell us whether
these _raræ aves_ are of pure blood or not, as is often the case.[10]
Moreover, these instances are proclaimed to the world with an air of
triumph, as if they were drawn at random from an inexhaustible arsenal
of facts, when in reality they are all that the most anxious research
could discover, and form the stock in trade of every declaimer on the
absolute equality of races.
Had it pleased the Creator to endow all branches of the human family
equally, all would then have pursued the same career, though, perhaps,
not all with equal rapidity. Some, favored by circumstances, might have
distanced others in the race; a few, peculiarly unfortunately situated,
would have lagged behind. Still, the progress of all would have been in
the same direction, all would have had the same stages to traverse. Now
is this the case? There are not a few who assert it. From our earliest
infancy we are told of the savage, barbarous, semi-civilized, civilized,
and enlightened states. These we are taught to consider as the steps of
the ladder by which man climbs up to infinite perfection, we ourselves
being near the top, while others are either a little below us, or have
scarcely yet firmly established themselves upon the first rounds. In the
beautiful language of Schiller, these latter are to us a mirror in which
we behold our own ancestors, as an adult in the children around him
re-witnesses his own infancy. This is, in a measure, true of nations of
the same race, but is it true with regard to different races? It is
little short of presumption to venture to combat an idea perhaps more
extensively spread than any of our time, yet this we shall endeavor to
do. Were the differences in civilization which we observe in various
nations of the world, differences of degree only, and not of kind, it is
obvious that the most advanced individual in one degree must closely
approach the confines of a higher. But this is not the case. The highest
degree of culture known to Hindoo or Chinese civilization, approaches
not the possessor one step nearer to the ideas and views of the
European. The Chinese civilization is as perfect, in its own way, as
ours, nay more so.[11] It is not a mere child, or even an adult not yet
arrived at maturity; it is rather a decrepit old man. It too has its
degrees; it too has had its periods of infancy, of adult age, of
maturity. And when we contemplate its fruits, the immense works which
have been undertaken and completed under its ægis, the systems of morals
and politics to which it gave rise, the inventions which signalized its
more vigorous periods, we cannot but admit that it is entitled in a high
degree to our veneration and esteem.[12] Moreover it has excellencies
which our civilization as yet has not; it pervades all classes, ours
not. In the whole Chinese empire, comprising, as it does, one-third of
the human race, we find few individuals unable to read and write; in
China proper, none.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account