The Mormon puzzle, and how to solve itBeers, R. W.
History
The Mormon puzzle, and how to solve it
Beers, R. W.
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints -- Doctrines; Latter Day Saint churches -- Doctrines
And if impossible there, it will be doubly so here. Very likely if this
proposition should become a law, and trustees be sent into the Territory,
they would find themselves mere official ornaments without anything to do,
for they would find no funds of which to take possession. The Mormons say
that whatever property their Church has is owned and held, just as the
property of the Presbyterian or Methodist Church, by the respective
congregations. Formerly its property, real and personal, was held as that
of the Catholic Church is--by a trustee in trust, and administered in the
same way. The President of the Church, like the bishop, was the nominal
owner, but held it in trust for the various congregations or parishes; but
the Mormon Church authorities have determined that the property should be
held and administered by and for each respective congregational or ward
organization; and so you see that if trustees were appointed _they would
likely find that the Mormon Church Corporation had no funds_.
Along with this enactment, there is another which provides for _the
confiscating of the funds unlawfully gathered by the Mormon Church_.
Now, this act is not open to the same constitutional objection that the
preceding is. It is a legal proposal, for only $50,000 can be held by any
religious organization free from taxation; but its wisdom, justice, and
practicability are very doubtful.
Its execution would be exceedingly difficult, so that not many honorable
men would be willing to take the position of trustees of the funds which
such a measure would remove from Mormon hands. The difficulty of
separating the funds unlawfully gathered by the Mormon Church from those
which justly belong to it would be very great, if not insuperable. Hence
it would be very hard to defend such a measure from the serious charge of
arbitrary interference with the rights of property.
It cannot be defended at all, unless it is put on the ground that the
Mormon people, by continued hostility to the Government, have forfeited
all political rights of every kind--even the right of property. It cannot
be defended on the basis of justice at all. It looks to us to be a
proposed theft in the name and under the authority of law.
But, as has been said before, in all probability if this measure should
become a law, the trustees would find no funds at all; for they could
easily be transferred (nominally at least) to private parties.
Just here let me say that the people should be on their guard as to what
they believe concerning the Mormons and the wealth of their Church.
Charges are made that have no foundation whatever in truth, and small and
trivial circumstances are so exaggerated and warped that they appear as
crooked monstrosities, and are presented to the world as common Mormon
occurrences.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account