The hostile attitude of the most modern mythological tendency [chiefly
represented by the Society for Comparative Mythological Research]
against all attempts at establishing a relation between dream and
myth[19] is for the most part the outcome of the restriction of the
parallelization to the so-called nightmares [Alpträume], as attempted
in Laistner’s notable book, “The Riddle of the Sphinx,” 1889, and
also of ignorance of the relevant teachings of Freud. The latter
help us not only to understand the dreams themselves, but also show
their symbolism and close relationship with all psychic phenomena in
general, especially with the day dreams or phantasies, with artistic
creativeness, and with certain disturbances of the normal psychic
function. A common share in all these productions belongs to a single
psychic function, the human imagination. It is to this imaginative
faculty—of humanity at large rather than individual—that the modern
myth theory is obliged to concede a high rank, perhaps the first, for
the ultimate origin of all myths. The interpretation of the myths in
the astral sense, or more accurately speaking as “almanac tales,”
gives rise to the query, according to Lessmann,—in view of a creative
imagination of humanity,—if the first germ for the origin of such
tales is to be sought precisely in the processes in the heavens;[20]
or if, on the contrary, readymade tales of an entirely different
[but presumably psychic] origin were only subsequently transferred
to the heavenly bodies. Ehrenreich (General Mythology, 1910, p. 104)
makes a more positive admission: The mythologic evolution certainly
begins on a terrestrian soil, in so far as experiences must first be
gathered in the immediate surroundings before they can be projected
into the heavenly universe. And Wundt tells us (loc. cit., p. 282)
that the theory of the evolution of mythology according to which it
first originates in the heavens whence at a later period it descends
to earth, is not only contradictory to the history of the myth,
which is unaware of such a migration, but is likewise contradictory
to the psychology of myth-formation which must repudiate this
translocation as internally impossible. We are also convinced that the
myths,[21] originally at least, are structures of the human faculty
of imagination, which at some time were projected for certain reasons
upon the heavens,[22] and may be secondarily transferred to the
heavenly bodies, with their enigmatical phenomena. The significance of
the unmistakeable traces which this transference has imprinted upon
the myths, as the fixed figures, and so forth, must by no means be
underrated, although the origin of these figures was possibly psychic
in character, and they were subsequently made the basis of the almanac
and firmament calculations, precisely on account of this significance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account