Natural history -- England -- Wiltshire; Wiltshire (England) -- History
The height of Our Lady steeple at Salisbury was never found so little
as 400 foot, and never more than 406 foot, by the observations of Thom.
Nash, surveyor of the workes of this church: but Colonell John Wyndham
did take the height more accurately, An° 1684, by a barometer: sc. the
height of the weather-dore of Our Lady Church steeple at Salisbury from
the ground is 4280 inches. The mercury subsided in that height 42/100
of an inch. He affirms that the height of the said steeple is 404 foot,
which he hath tryed severall times; and by the help of his barometer,
which is accurately made according to his direction, he will with great
facility take the height of any mountain: quod N.B. [Col. Wyndham’s
measurement has been adopted as correct by most authors who have
written on the subject since.—J. B.]
Memorandum. About 1669 or 1670 Bishop Ward invited Sir Christopher Wren
to Salisbury, out of curiosity, to survey the church there, as to the
steeple, architecture, &c. He was above a weeke about it, and writt a
sheet or a sheet and a halfe, an account of it, which he presented to
the bishop. I asked the bishop since for it, and he told me he had lent
it, to whom he could not tell, and had no copy of it. ’Tis great pity
the paines of so great an artist should be lost. Sir Christopher tells
me he hath no copie of it neither.
This year, 1691, Mr. Anth. Wood tells me, he hath gott a transcript of
Sir Chr. Wren’s paper; which obtain, and insert here. I much doubted I
should never have heard of it again.
[Soon after writing this passage Aubrey probably obtained a copy of Sir
Christopher Wren’s report, which he has inserted in his original
manuscript. It is dated in 1669, and occupies eleven folio pages. In
The History and Antiquities of the Cathedral of Salisbury, &c. (1723,
8vo.), it is printed, and described as “An Architectonical Account of
this Cathedral”, by “an eminent gentleman”. Part of the same report was
printed in Wren’s Parentalia (1750); and a short abstract of it will
also be found in Dodsworth’s Salisbury Cathedral (written by the late
Mr. Hatcher), p. 172. In a communication from the last named gentleman
in 1841, when he was engaged upon his History of Salisbury, he wrote to
me as follows: “I have lately fallen upon what appears to have been Sir
C. Wren’s original report relative to the cathedral; a very elaborate
report on the state of the building in 1691, by a person named Naish;
some good observations on the bending of the piers (anonymous); and
several estimates and observations made by Price. What I shall do with
them I have not yet determined.”—J. B.]
Wardour Castle was very strongly built of freestone. I never saw it but
when I was a youth; the day after part of it was blown up: and the
mortar was so good that one of the little towers reclining on one side
did hang together and not fall in peeces. It was called Warder Castle
from the conserving there the ammunition of the West.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account