The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
But in 1911 Rutherford showed that the positive electricity was also
concentrated into tiny specks. His scattering experiments proved that
the atom was able to exert large electrical forces which would be
impossible unless the positive charge acted as a highly concentrated
source of attraction; it must be contained in a nucleus minute in
comparison with the dimensions of the atom. Thus for the first time the
main volume of the atom was entirely evacuated, and a “solar system”
type of atom was substituted for a substantial “billiard-ball”. Two
years later Niels Bohr developed his famous theory on the basis of
[Pg 3]
the Rutherford atom, and since then rapid progress has been made.
Whatever further changes of view are in prospect, a reversion to the
old substantial atoms is unthinkable.
The accepted conclusion at the present day is that all varieties of
matter are ultimately composed of two elementary constituents—protons
and electrons. Electrically these are the exact opposites of one
another, the proton being a charge of positive electricity and the
electron a charge of negative electricity. But in other respects their
properties are very different. The proton has 1840 times the mass of
the electron, so that nearly all the mass of matter is due to its
constituent protons. The proton is not found unadulterated except in
hydrogen, which seems to be the most primitive form of matter, its atom
consisting of one proton and one electron. In other atoms a number
of protons and a lesser number of electrons are cemented together to
form a nucleus; the electrons required to make up the balance are
scattered like remote satellites of the nucleus, and can even escape
from the atom and wander freely through the material. The diameter of
an electron is about ¹⁄₅₀₀₀₀ of the diameter of an atom; that of the
nucleus is not very much larger; an isolated proton is supposed to be
much smaller still.
Thirty years ago there was much debate over the question of
aether-drag—whether the earth moving round the sun drags the aether
with it. At that time the solidity of the atom was unquestioned, and
it was difficult to believe that matter could push its way through the
aether without disturbing it. It was surprising and perplexing to find
as the result of experiments that no convection of the aether occurred.
But we now realise that the aether can slip through the atoms as easily
as through the solar system, and our expectation is all the other way.
[Pg 4]
We shall return to the “solar system” atom in later chapters. For the
present the two things which concern us are (1) its extreme emptiness,
and (2) the fact that it is made up of electrical charges.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account