The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
Rutherford’s nuclear theory of the atom is not usually counted as
one of the scientific revolutions of the present century. It was a
far-reaching discovery, but a discovery falling within the classical
scheme of physics. The nature and significance of the discovery could
be stated in plain terms, i.e. in terms of conceptions already current
in science. The epithet “revolutionary” is usually reserved for two
great modern developments—the Relativity Theory and the Quantum
Theory. These are not merely new discoveries as to the content of the
world; they involve changes in our mode of thought about the world.
They cannot be stated immediately in plain terms because we have first
to grasp new conceptions undreamt of in the classical scheme of physics.
I am not sure that the phrase “classical physics” has ever been
closely defined. But the general idea is that the scheme of natural
law developed by Newton in the Principia provided a pattern
which all subsequent developments might be expected to follow. Within
the four corners of the scheme great changes of outlook were possible;
the wave-theory of light supplanted the corpuscular theory; heat was
changed from substance (caloric) to energy of motion; electricity from
continuous fluid to nuclei of strain in the aether. But this was all
allowed for in the elasticity of the original scheme. Waves, kinetic
energy, and strain already had their place in the scheme; and the
application of the same conceptions to account for a wider range of
phenomena was a tribute to the comprehensiveness of Newton’s original
[Pg 5]
outlook.
We have now to see how the classical scheme broke down.
The FitzGerald Contraction. We can best start from the following
fact. Suppose that you have a rod moving at very high speed. Let
it first be pointing transverse to its line of motion. Now turn it
through a right angle so that it is along the line of motion. The rod
contracts. It is shorter when it is along the line of motion than when
it is across the line of motion.
This contraction, known as the FitzGerald contraction, is exceedingly
small in all ordinary circumstances. It does not depend at all on
the material of the rod but only on the speed. For example, if the
speed is 19 miles a second—the speed of the earth round the sun—the
contraction of length is 1 part in 200,000,000, or 2½ inches in the
diameter of the earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account