The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
This is demonstrated by a number of experiments of different kinds of
which the earliest and best known is the Michelson-Morley experiment
first performed in 1887, repeated more accurately by Morley and Miller
in 1905, and again by several observers within the last year or two. I
am not going to describe these experiments except to mention that the
convenient way of giving your rod a large velocity is to carry it on
the earth which moves at high speed round the sun. Nor shall I discuss
here how complete is the proof afforded by these experiments. It is
much more important that you should realise that the contraction is
just what would be expected from our current knowledge of a material
rod.
You are surprised that the dimensions of a moving rod can be altered
[Pg 6]
merely by pointing it different ways. You expect them to remain
unchanged. But which rod are you thinking of? (You remember my two
tables.) If you are thinking of continuous substance, extending in
space because it is the nature of substance to occupy space, then
there seems to be no valid cause for a change of dimensions. But the
scientific rod is a swarm of electrical particles rushing about and
widely separated from one another. The marvel is that such a swarm
should tend to preserve any definite extension. The particles, however,
keep a certain average spacing so that the whole volume remains
practically steady; they exert electrical forces on one another, and
the volume which they fill corresponds to a balance between the forces
drawing them together and the diverse motions tending to spread them
apart. When the rod is set in motion these electrical forces change.
Electricity in motion constitutes an electric current. But electric
currents give rise to forces of a different type from those due to
electricity at rest, viz. magnetic forces. Moreover these forces
arising from the motion of electric charges will naturally be of
different intensity in the directions along and across the line of
motion.
By setting in motion the rod with all the little electric charges
contained in it we introduce new magnetic forces between the particles.
Clearly the original balance is upset, and the average spacing between
the particles must alter until a new balance is found. And so the
extension of the swarm of particles—the length of the rod—alters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account