The New Departure; Or, Thoughts for Loyal ChurchmenHoare, Edward
Religion
The New Departure; Or, Thoughts for Loyal Churchmen
Hoare, Edward
Church of England -- Customs and practices; Ritualism
But there is one other result of a return to the First Book which is of
supreme importance, though I have not yet seen any notice of it in the
recent discussion, viz., that by returning to the First Book we should
get behind the date of the Articles. The Articles were not drawn up till
the year A.D. 1552, so that by adopting the First Book we should go back
to a date at which the Articles did not exist, at which, in fact, the
Church of England had drawn up no formal dogmatic protest against the
errors of Rome. The Reformation began with the reform of the Liturgy,
before there was any authoritative statement of distinctive truth, and
when the minds of men were passing through a rapid transition. To this
transition period the First Book belongs; and if we were to decide on
adopting the Liturgy of the transition there would be a manifest
inconsistency in combining with it those definite statements of truth
which were carefully drawn up afterwards when the great gulf was past,
and the work of the Reformation in essential points complete.
With all these facts before us, it is impossible to mistake the character
of the proposal made. Whether we look at the history or the contents of
the book, we are brought to the same conclusion. It is not a proposal to
improve our Prayer Book or to adapt it to the special demands of the day.
It is a proposal to depart from the Prayer Book altogether, and to return
to the transition state through which the Church of England passed in the
transition days of the Reformation. The First Book of Edward bore just
the same relationship to the Use of Sarum that Basingstoke does to the
city of Salisbury. The Reformers halted awhile there on the up line, but
they could not rest, so they soon left it to complete their journey. We
are now invited to return there; but is there any thinking man who can
suppose for one moment that we are intended to remain there, when we have
the public avowal of the undenied preference for “the unreformed
liturgies” and the Use of Sarum? Is it not perfectly clear that the
attraction to the First Book is simply this, that it is a station for the
express train on the direct down line to Sarum?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account