Germany -- Politics and government -- 1918-1933; Germany. Verfassung (1919)
It was above all the question of the Rhineland. Through Trimborn,
spokesman of the Centre, deputies of Cologne and Aix-la-Chapelle, the
inhabitants of the Rhine country presented their claims. Prussia, product
of a political dynasty, is an aggregation of different races, for there
is no Prussian nation. The people who live on the banks of the Rhine feel
themselves handicapped in comparison with the other German races, since
they are not in direct contact with the Reich, and are represented in it
only through the medium of Prussia. It follows from this that the people
of the Rhine cannot have free expression of their native tendencies nor
develop their own culture. They suffer in every way by not having their
own administration and by having to endure Prussian functionaries over
them.
The objections which came from the Prussian side to the formation of
a Rhine state were not valid, insisted the partisans of the latter.
The separation of the Rhineland from Prussia need not entail in itself
a separation from the Reich. On the contrary, the Rhineland would be
more solidly and intimately welded to the Reich if they belonged to it
directly instead of being only part of Prussia. Nor would they admit
the argument that the Rhineland should belong to Prussia to supplement
economically the relatively poor Eastern provinces of Prussia. “The old
cry of the poor East and the rich West is to-day dead,” the Rhinelanders
insisted. War and revolution have done infinitely more damage to
industrial Rhine than to the rural Eastern provinces. Finally, while it
is possible that for a certain period, undoubtedly short, there might
be disturbances in Germany caused by the creation of a new state, these
would be less harmful than leaving on the Rhine a situation that would
remain a permanent source of trouble. In conclusion, the representatives
of the Rhineland demanded the creation of a Republic of the West, which
should take in the provinces of the Rhine, a part of Westphalia and the
territories of Oldenburg and Bremen.
On the other hand, the representatives of Hanover demanded justice
against the violent annexation to which it had been subjected in 1866.
There was formed in the Assembly a “German-Hanoverian” group which
demanded “a free Hanover within a new Germany.” It involved the fusion of
Lower Saxony with Hanover and Brunswick.
In the same way the small states of Central Germany wanted to fuse into
a single state which would take in also part of the territory of Prussia
and the region of Erfurt, and would form the state of Thuringia.
To these claims the representatives of Prussia, particularly the Prussian
Minister of Justice, Heinze, and the German Nationalist, Düringer,
replied, that the separatists were rats who were deserting a sinking
ship; and they presented a vigorous defence of Prussia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account