The New Irish Constitution: An Exposition and Some Arguments
History
The New Irish Constitution: An Exposition and Some Arguments
Home rule -- Ireland; Ireland -- Politics and government
“Ireland,” he said, “would have no reason to complain; the terms
acceded to by England were proposed by herself, and all her wishes
would now be gratified in the way which she herself liked best.
But as it was possible that if nothing more was to be done than
what he had stated to be his intention, Ireland might, perhaps,
think of fresh grievances and rise yearly in her demands, it was
fit and proper that something should be done towards establishing
on a firm and solid basis the future connection of the two
kingdoms. But that was not to be proposed by him here in
Parliament: it would be the duty of the Crown to look to that; the
business might be first begun by His Majesty’s servants in
Ireland, and if afterwards it should be necessary to enter into a
treaty, Commissioners might be sent from the British Parliament or
from the Crown, to enter upon it and bring the negotiation to a
happy issue, by giving mutual satisfaction to both countries, and
establishing a treaty which should be sanctified by the most
solemn forms of the Constitution of both countries.”(135)
For the moment, however, the hope of commencing negotiations with these
objects had to be abandoned, and when, on May 27th, the Royal Message
conveying the intention of His Majesty to concede all the demands of the
Irish Parliament was delivered in Dublin, the Secretary to the
Lord-Lieutenant announced that no measures were then intended to be
grounded on the second English resolution of May 17th. For a time,
however, the Duke of Portland continued to hope against hope, and to
nourish the vain expectations with which from the beginning he had buoyed
himself up, and had misled his colleagues. During the month of June he
allowed himself to be persuaded by Mr. Ogilvy, the husband of the Duchess
of Leinster, and stepfather to Lord Edward Fitzgerald, that Grattan was
not really so intractable as he seemed to be, and in a secret and
confidential despatch, written on June 6th, he urged that the Irish
Parliament should not be at once prorogued, in order to give time for a
possible arrangement in regard to common affairs. But on June 22nd he was
reluctantly compelled to express his disappointment and mortification at
finding that his hopes had proved entirely fallacious, and that Mr. Ogilvy
was a person not to be relied upon. The prorogation of the Irish
Parliament was accordingly suffered to take place on July 27th, and here
the matter ended.(136) “Thus,” exclaimed Grattan to his applauding
audience—“thus have you sealed a treaty with Great Britain; on her side
the restoration of the final judicature; the extinction of her legislative
claim; of her Privy Council; of her perpetual Mutiny Bill; the repeal of
the Act of legislative supremacy; on your side satisfaction! And thus are
the two nations compacted for ever in freedom and peace.”(137)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account