The Newmarket, Bury, Thetford and Cromer Road: Sport and history on an East Anglian turnpike — John Shaqi
The Newmarket, Bury, Thetford and Cromer Road: Sport and history on an East Anglian turnpikeHarper, Charles G. (Charles George)
History
The Newmarket, Bury, Thetford and Cromer Road: Sport and history on an East Anglian turnpike
Harper, Charles G. (Charles George)
England -- Description and travel; England -- Social life and customs
A halt on the Lea Bridge Road is certainly stimulating to the
imagination. On any summer midday that does not happen to be a Saturday,
a Sunday, or a Bank Holiday, the contemplative man has it all to
himself. Lazarus, from Walthamstow, in his many thousands of clerks and
workmen, has departed, long ago, for the counting-houses and workshops
of the city; and Dives from Clapton has, in more leisurely fashion,
followed them to his office, or meeting of directors. The dirty,
out-of-date tramcars that ply along the road, and seem never to be
washed, are no longer crowded, and the traffic consists chiefly of
costermongers’ carts and harrows, on their way to their daily
house-to-house calls in the countless streets of that sprawling
Walthamstow and that loose-limbed Leyton. The marshes, the distant
frontier of banked-up houses, and even the long railway viaducts that
stretch like monstrous centipedes across the levels, look interesting,
and the water-loving willows and graceful clumps of the bushy poplar are
not wanting to add something of beauty to the scene. There is, too, if
you do but choose to look for it, a kind of skulking romance to be found
on the Essex side of the Lea, where the rustic cottages come down to the
fringe of the marsh; their faces away from, their back gardens towards
it. Quite humble cottages, roofed with the old red pantiles, and
sometimes weatherboarded; the crazy wooden palings of their gardens
patched and mended with the oddest timber salvage, from the unnecessary
sturdiness of an odd post from a four-poster bedstead, to the
blue-painted staves of petroleum barrels and wrecked wheels of bygone
conveyances. The posts of clothes-lines are permanent features of these
gardens, and on good “drying days” the most intimate articles of
underwear flaunt a defiant challenge across the valley to the prim
susceptibilities of Upper Clapton and Stamford Hill—which put their
washing out. It is not, however, in the under-linen and the stockings,
very darny and limp, and lacking the interest of a shapely leg, that the
skulking romance, already alluded to, lies. No, not at all: in fact,
otherwise. You may perceive it in the varying lengths of those back
gardens, which in their yard or so of more or less infallibly register
the degree of courage or impudence possessed by the original squatters
and their immediate descendants upon this land. For the sites of these
cottages and their little pleasaunces were all originally stolen,
cabbaged, pinched, nicked—what you will—from the common land of the
marshes; and where you see a yard or two of extra length, there may be
observed, set down in concrete form, the measure of that courage
possessed by those squatters in times gone by. Such illegitimate intakes
are no longer possible, for publicity alone, even were it not for the
evidence of the Ordnance maps, would forbid, and the romance of them is
a fossil survival, rather than a living thing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account