The Night Side of LondonRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
The Night Side of London
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
“I would sooner take to poison
Than a single cup set eyes on
Of that bitter and guilty stuff ye
Talk of by the name of coffee;”
and the _Times_ everywhere inculcates the idea that, without wine, poetry
and eloquence and wit were dumb and dead. Was Sidney Smith witty, was
Shelley a poet, or was he who in old times drew away the Hebrew multitude
from the crowded streets of Jerusalem out into the desert, whose food was
locusts and wild honey, whose raiment was a leathern girdle—was he not
eloquent, as he warned the terror-stricken mob that hung upon his lips of
the wrath to come? Facts are not in favour of the wine-drinkers. Of
Waller Dr Johnson writes, “In a time when fancy and gaiety were the most
powerful recommendations to regard, it is not likely that Waller was
forgotten. He passed his time in the company that was highest both in
rank and wit, from which even his obstinate sobriety did not exclude him.
Though he drank water, he was enabled by his fertility of mind to
heighten the mirth of Bacchanalian assemblies; and Mr Saville said that
‘no man in England should keep him company without drinking, but Ned
Waller.’” “In Parliament,” says Burnet, “he was the delight of the
House, and, though old, said the liveliest things of any of them.” The
truth is, men have often reserved the outpourings of their mind for the
social glass, and have fallen into the natural mistake of believing that
it was the glass, and not the opportunity and the action of mind upon
mind, that elicited a certain amount of joyous fun. I must quote an
anecdote from Sir Walter Scott’s Life to illustrate my meaning. He tells
us one of his school-fellows was always at the top of the class. Young
Scott found that when asked a question the lad alluded to was in the
habit of fumbling one peculiar button. Scott cut off that button. The
next time the poor fellow was asked a question, as usual he put his hand
to fumble the friendly button—alas! it was gone, and with it his power,
and he speedily lost his place. The writers I have quoted, to be
consistent, should argue it was the button that made that lad sharp and
clever.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account