The Nobel Prize winners in literatureMarble, Annie Russell
History
The Nobel Prize winners in literature
Marble, Annie Russell
Authors; Literature -- History and criticism; Nobel Prize winners; Nobel Prizes; Nobel, Alfred Bernhard, 1833-1896
Because of difficulties in interpreting certain sections and
elucidating other phrases, this Code of Statutes was drawn up “in
consultation with a representative, nominated by Robert Nobel’s family,
and submitted to consideration of the King.” After adjustments of
interests had been “amicably entered into” by the testator’s heirs,
June 5, 1898, it was decreed that “The instructions of the will above
as set forth shall serve as a criterion for the administration of the
Foundation (Nobel) in conjunction with the elucidations and further
stipulations contained in this Code.” One “stipulation” was that “each
of the annual prizes founded by the said will shall be awarded at least
once during each ensuing five-year period after the year in which the
Nobel Foundation comes into force.” The phrase used by Nobel in the
words relating to the prize in Literature, “the Academy at Stockholm,”
was interpreted “as understood to be the Swedish Academy--Svenska
Akademien.” Another significant explanation was--the “term,
‘Literature,’ used in the will shall be understood to embrace not only
works falling under the category of Polite Literature, but also other
writings which may claim to possess literary value by reason of their
form or their mode of exposition.” This last provision, which seems
elastic and somewhat vague, has not led thus far to undue difficulties
and criticisms.
The phrase “during the preceding year,” as applied to scientific and
literary achievements alike, was a strange, impractical provision which
was well interpreted broadly in the Code thus: “only such works or
inventions shall be eligible as have appeared ‘during the preceding
year’ is to be understood, that a work or invention for which a reward
under the terms of the will is contemplated, shall set forth the _most
modern results_ of work being done in that of the departments as
defined in the will to which it belongs; works or inventions of older
standing to be taken into consideration only in case their importance
has not previously been demonstrated.”
Two other stipulations were made that have been applied to the awards
in literature, as elsewhere, “The amount allotted to one prize may be
divided equally between two works submitted, should each of such works
be deemed to merit a prize.” Thus, in 1904, the prize was divided
between José Echegaray, the Spanish dramatist, and Frédéric Mistral,
the poet of Provence; again, in 1917, it was divided between two Danish
writers, Gjellerup and Pontoppidan. On the other hand, if all of the
“works under examination fail to attain to the standard of excellence”
required, no award need be given that year, the “amount added to the
main fund or may be set aside to form a special fund for that of one of
the sections to promote the object of the testator.” In 1914 and 1918
there were no awards in literature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account