The Non-Christian Cross: An Enquiry into the Origin and History of the Symbol Eventually Adopted as That of Our ReligionParsons, John Denham
Religion
The Non-Christian Cross: An Enquiry into the Origin and History of the Symbol Eventually Adopted as That of Our Religion
Parsons, John Denham
Crosses
"It is possible to avoid it if we do what the Apostle
saith 'Mortify your members which are upon earth,' and
if we always carry about in our bodies the death of
Christ. For it is certain that where the death of Christ
is carried about, sin cannot reign. For the power of the
_stauros_ of Christ is so great that if it be set before
a man's eyes and kept faithfully in his mind so that he
look with steadfast eyes of the mind upon that same
death of Christ, no concupiscence, no sensuality, no
natural passion, and no envious desire, is able to
overcome him."[29]
Whether however this reference to the "_stauros_ of Christ" is or is
not a reference to the figure of the cross, is doubtful.
Such is the evidence regarding the cross, whether considered as
immaterial sign or material symbol, obtainable from the writings of the
Christians who lived between the days of the Apostles and those of
Constantine; other of course than the _Octavius_ of Minucius Felix,
which was dealt with in the last chapter, and the writings of Irenaeus,
which will be dealt with in the next.
Among the noteworthy features of the evidence in question prominently
stands out the smallness of its volume.
This is but a negative point, however; and what should be carefully
borne in mind is that the evidence as a whole leads to the conclusion
that the Christians of the second and third centuries made use of the
sign and venerated the figure of the cross without, as Dean Farrar
admits, it "only or even mainly," reminding them of the death of Jesus;
and therefore otherwise than as a representation of the instrument of
execution upon which Jesus died.[30]
CHAPTER IV.
CURIOUS STATEMENTS OF IRENAEUS.
The special importance of the evidence of Irenaeus, is due to the fact
that of all the Fathers whose undisputed works have come down to us he
is the only one who can be considered to have been anything like in
touch with the Apostles. As an acquaintance of the aged Polycarp, who
is said to have been in his youth a pupil of the aged Evangelist and
Apostle St. John and to have met yet other Apostles, Irenaeus had
opportunities for ascertaining facts concerning the life and death of
Jesus which the other Fathers upon whose works we rely did not possess.
What, then, does this important witness have to say, which bears upon
the points at issue? As a matter of fact, very little.
There are, however, two passages in the works of Irenaeus which it
would not be right to altogether ignore.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account