The Norse discoverers of America : $b the Wineland sagas translated & discussedGathorne-Hardy, G. M. (Geoffrey Malcolm)
History
The Norse discoverers of America : $b the Wineland sagas translated & discussed
Gathorne-Hardy, G. M. (Geoffrey Malcolm)
America -- Discovery and exploration -- Norse
offensive but little.’ So they did, but the savages,[23] after shooting
at them for a while, afterwards fled away, each as quickly as he could.
Then Thorvald asked his men if they were wounded at all; they said
there were no casualties. ‘I have got a wound under the arm,’ said he;
‘an arrow flew between the gunwale and the shield under my arm and here
it is, and it will be my death. Now my advice is that you prepare to go
away as quickly as possible, after carrying me to that headland which
I thought the best place to dwell in: maybe it was the truth that came
into my mouth that I should stay there awhile. Bury me there with a
cross at my head and at my feet, and call it Crossness hereafter for
ever.’ Greenland was then converted, though Eric the Red died before
conversion.
Now Thorvald died, but they carried out all his instructions, after
which they went and met their companions, and told each other such
tidings as they knew, and they stayed there that winter, gathering
grapes and vines for their ship. Then in the spring they prepared to
go back to Greenland, and arrived with their ship in Ericsfjord, with
great news to tell Leif.
NOTE. ‘_A wooden barn_’. (_Kornhjálm af tre_). This is the only
allusion, direct or indirect, which is made to corn in the course
of the Flatey Book version. It is frequently referred to as one of
the absurdities affecting the credit of this part of the story.
But it does not seem to me to have any necessary or probable
connexion with the wild corn of the Saga of Eric. The ‘selfsown
wheat’ is never mentioned by the historian of the Flatey Book;
unlike the wild grapes, he does not seem to have heard of this
feature. It is therefore impossible to suppose that the barn is an
imaginary feature introduced to colour the reports of wild corn.
It is recorded merely as the only trace of human occupation met
with during the exploration conducted in the ship’s pinnace. And
its very inappropriateness to the uncultivated crops of which we
are told in the rival version seems to me a strong proof of its
authenticity. Like the whole of this part of the story, it is too
purposeless to be invented. We need not on this account imagine
that it actually was a barn. The storage of Indian corn in New
England, according to the earliest observers, was, for the most
part at any rate, in holes in the ground, and an island remote from
human habitation seems a most unlikely situation.
On the other hand, De Laet’s _Nieuwe Werelt_ reports Hudson as
having seen ‘a house well constructed of oak bark, and circular in
shape, so that it had the appearance of being well built, with an
arched roof. It contained a great quantity of maize or Indian corn,
and beans of the last year’s growth, and there lay near the house,
for the purpose of drying, enough to load three ships.’ (_Hudson
the Navigator_, Hakluyt Society, p. 161).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account