The North American Slime-Moulds: A Descriptive List of All Species of Myxomycetes Hitherto Reported from the Continent of North America, with Notes on Some Extra-Limital SpeciesMacbride, Thomas H. (Thomas Huston)
Science
The North American Slime-Moulds: A Descriptive List of All Species of Myxomycetes Hitherto Reported from the Continent of North America, with Notes on Some Extra-Limital Species
Macbride, Thomas H. (Thomas Huston)
Myxomycetes
Dr. Schroeter, a recent writer on the subject, after showing the
probable connection between the phycochromaceous Algae and the simplest
colorless forms, namely, the _Schizomycetes_, goes on to remark: "At the
same point where the Schizomycetous series take rise, there begin
certain other lines of development among the most diminutive
protoplasmic masses.... Through the amoebae one of these lines gives
rise on the one hand to rhizopods and sponges in the animal kingdom, on
the other to the _Myxomycetes_ among the fungi." This ranges the
Myxomycetes, in origin at least, near the _Schizomycetes_.
The brilliant studies of Dr. Thaxter, resulting in the discovery and
recognition of a new group, a new order of the schizomycetes, strikingly
confirm the judgment of Schroeter.[10] Here we have forms that strangely
unite characteristics of both the groups in question. If on the one hand
the _Myxobacteria_ are certainly schizomycetes, on the other they just
as certainly offer in their developmental history "phenomena closely
resembling those presented by plasmodia or pseudo-plasmodia...." Now the
schizophytes certainly pass by gradations easy to the filamentous algae,
and so to relationship with the plants, and the discovery of the
_Myxobacteriacae_, brings the myxomycetes very near the vegetable
kingdom if not within it.
All authorities agree that the myxomycetes have no connection in the
direction of upward development, "keinen Anschluss nach oben," if then
their only relationship with other organisms is to be found at the
bottom (centre) of the series only, it is purely a matter of
indifference whether we say plant or animal, for at the only point where
there is connection there is no distinction.
But why call them either animals or plants? Was Nature then so poor that
forsooth only two lines of differentiation were at the beginning open
for her effort? May we not rather believe that life's tree may have
risen at first in hundreds of tentative trunks of which two have become
in the progress of the ages so far dominant as to entirely obscure less
progressive types? The Myxomycetes are independent; all that we may
attempt is to assert their near kinship with one or other of life's
great branches.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account