The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization consideredShort, John T. (John Thomas)
History
The North Americans of Antiquity: Their origin, migrations, and type of civilization considered
Short, John T. (John Thomas)
Indians -- Origin; Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Indians of North America -- Antiquities
Landa’s key contains seventy-one
signs (twenty for the days, eighteen for the months, and thirty-three
in the alphabet.) M. de Rosny, by a careful examination of all the
hieratic texts of the Mayas which are known, has discovered more than
seven hundred different signs. Of this number he has deciphered and
classified four hundred and thirty-nine as follows: Alphabetic signs,
including Landa’s (of which all the others are but varieties), two
hundred and sixty-two; signs of the days, one hundred and fifty-nine;
and the eighteen signs of the months given by Landa. All these signs
are classified in a double folio plate (Pl. XIII) which we believe
deserves to be regarded as the larger portion of the much-sought-for
Maya Rosetta stone. Considerable difference of opinion has existed as
to the direction in which the hieroglyphics should be read. Brasseur
held the view that the proper order was from right to left, and that
the beginning of a book was where our books end. This mistake brought
down the ridicule of scholars upon the Abbé’s head, when it was
discovered that he had begun at the wrong end to translate the _Troano
MS._ Mr. Bollaert says, “I have read from the bottom upwards and from
right to left.”[614] Dr. Brinton[615] has suggested some such order as
the following arrangement of the word _marvellous_:
o ll m
u e a
s v r
M. de Rosny has shown that the statement of Landa and the fact that the
human faces shown in the hieroglyphs look toward the left, indicate
that the signs should be read from left to right.[616] In rare cases
this order is reversed, as is seen on a couple of leaves of the _Codex
Peresianus_. There are, no doubt, numerous instances in which the
signs are arranged in perpendicular columns, and the order in which
such columns are to be read is not the same in all manuscripts. In the
Maya inscriptions and manuscripts, the “illustrations” or pictorial
figures are interwoven with the alphabetic signs forming an important
part of the writing. In many cases a page of MS. (as shown in Rosny’s
plates) is divided into sections or squares, in which the hieroglyphics
are inseparably connected with grotesque figures which accompany
them and form a part of the writing. M. de Rosny has undertaken the
classification and interpretation of all these figures which are found
in the existing Maya MSS. This doubtless will prove an important
auxiliary to the table of signs already alluded to. We may reasonably
expect that since M. de Rosny has shown the extensive character of the
Maya phonetic and symbolic alphabet, he will furnish us examples of its
application in the practical interpretation of the hieroglyphics, in
the latter part of his work. Recently Dr. Ph. Valentini has pronounced
the Landa alphabet a Spanish fabrication, of later date than the
conquest. See _Proceedings of Amer. Antiquarian Soc._ for April, 1880.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account