The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
twenty houses, to lodge the cacique and his attendants. At the foot
of this elevation they mark out a square place, according to the size
of the village, around which the leading men have their houses....
To ascend the elevation they have a straight passageway from bottom
to top, fifteen or twenty feet wide. Here steps are made by massive
beams, and others are planted firmly in the ground to serve as walls.
On all other sides of the platform the sides are cut steep.”[181]
Thomas quotes further from Garcilasso: “The chief, whose name was also
Guaxule, came out with five hundred men to meet him and took him in the
village (pueblo) in which were three hundred houses, and lodged him in
his own. This house stood on a high mound (cerro) similar to others we
have already mentioned. Round about was a roadway sufficiently broad
for six men to walk abreast.”[182] Again he quotes Le Page Du Pratz,
who visited the Natchez in 1720: “As I was an intimate friend of the
sovereign of the Natchez he showed me their temple, which is about
thirty feet square, and stands on an artificial mount about eight feet
high, by the side of a small river.”[183] There was also still another
reason for building on mounds or elevated platforms; the reason, or
at least one great reason, why the Mayas and Mexicans built on them,
namely the desire to protect the foundations. In Louisiana the Taensas,
in the time of La Salle, built of “sun-baked mud mixed with straw,
arched over with a dome-shaped roof.”[184] Now a structure of this
kind if reared on ordinary ground would soon be destroyed by the rains
and moisture sapping its foundations, but by placing it on an elevated
platform, where its footing would be comparatively dry, it would endure
a long time. A sacred house would be likely to be so placed, if not
others.
[Illustration: MISSISSIPPI VALLEY METHOD OF USING JACAL CONSTRUCTION,
ACCORDING TO THOMAS]
[Illustration: CLIFF OUTLOOK, CANYON DEL MUERTO, ARIZONA]
Every tribe had some kind of a sacred structure, the Omahas carrying
from place to place the three sacred tents referred to. The sacred
structures, too, were generally of the same style as the house of the
chief. Each village of the Natchez had a house devoted to the dead,
besides others dedicated to different sacred objects. The death-house
was oval, “having a circumference of one hundred feet—a simple hut
without a window, and with a low and narrow opening on the side for
the only door.”[185] Here were “garnered the choicest fetiches of the
tribe, of which some were moulded from clay and baked in the sun.
There, too, were gathered the bones of the dead; there an undying fire
was kept burning by appointed guardians as if to warm and light and
cheer the departed.”[185] “Hard by the temple, on an artificial mound
of earth, stood the hut of the Great Sun; around it were grouped the
cabins of the tribe.”[185]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account