The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
The greatest group of architectural remains on this continent is that
of the Maya region, mainly in Yucatan. For a full description of many
of these buildings the reader is referred again to the admirable work
of Maudsley. The Mayas were the greatest architects as well as the
greatest artists and greatest in almost everything of all the Amerinds,
and if Goodman is correct in his rendering of some of their chronology
they occupied the region more than ten thousand years.[215] Mound-like
foundations supported the buildings, which generally rose as from a
terrace, though sometimes the mound was very high and very steep, with
small space around the building crowning it. At Copan,[216] which was
in ruins before the Spaniards arrived, there is a great main terrace
from which mounds rise, the latter bearing the buildings. The casing
of the mound and the walls of buildings are of nicely dressed oblong
stones usually without mortar. The joints were not broken here, nor in
other Maya work. The mound slopes were terraced at five-foot intervals
and the steps were about five feet high. The so-called “triangular
arch” probably existed here as it did at the other Maya ruins. It
was made by advancing the courses, several feet above the base of an
opening, gradually toward each other till they met above, where a large
slab was usually laid across to bind the whole together. The ceilings
or roofs of many rooms in Maya ruins were wholly made this way. It has
also been called a corbel arch, though it is, in fact, not an arch at
all. See illustrations, pages 210, 235, and 237. There was no arch
in Amerindian architecture besides the one the Eskimo constructed in
his snow hut. The rooms are generally long and narrow in all the Maya
structures and no windows existed. The Maya inability to span wide
spaces was the cause of the narrow rooms and buildings. At Uxmal the
two main rooms of the so-called Governor’s Palace are sixty feet long
and only eleven to thirteen feet wide. The walls of all the structures
are very thick, though certain walls, as the rear ones, are usually
thicker than the others and have no openings, the latter, as a rule,
being along one, two, or three sides. This was a probable survival of
earlier defensive constructions similar to the communal fortresses of
the Puebloan type as particularly exemplified in the ruins of the Chaco
in New Mexico, where there were no rear openings. See ground plans,
page 232. At Palenque are some fine examples of the Maya construction.
The largest is called the palace and is 180 feet wide, 228 feet long,
and 25 feet high, with fourteen doorways on the side and eleven at the
ends. It was one story in height, as were all Maya buildings. There is
a vast amount of carving and stucco modelling around them. One of the
most unique constructions is that called the “Temple of the Cross,”
number one, or two, or three, by different explorers, there being two
structures much alike. See note 2, page 184. This is on top of a high
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account