The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
The Amerind singing at first seems extremely monotonous to our ears and
the impression is that all tribes sing alike, but each stock has its
own methods and peculiarities. A foundation principle with all in the
men’s singing seems to be an explosive quality of vocalisation—that
is, violent explosive tones instead of, as with us, tones long drawn
out. The Moki seems generally to sing nothing but “ho, ho, ho, ho, he,
he, he, he, hay, hay, hay,” etc., and he has quite a different rhythm
from the Ute, while the singing of the Navajo, when the singer opens
out all the stops, is more like the voice of a cat in the back yard
than any other sound in civilisation that I can think of. Farther north
the sounds change again: the Tlinkit vocalisation suggests death by
strangulation.
[Illustration: MENOMINEE TAMBOURINE DRUM
A common form with many tribes
]
[Illustration: OMAHA BOX DRUM
A common form with most tribes. Originally made from a hollow log
]
Fillmore states that the Navajo songs were the most primitive of any
he studied. “They form in fact the connecting link between excited
howling and excited singing. The quality of tone is indescribable,
being more like a yelp than anything else; but the intervals yelped
are unmistakably those of the major chord or of the minor chord.
The tone-quality is that of shouting, or even of howling, but the
pitch-relations into which they tend to fall are those of the major
chord.... Some of the Navaho songs are illustrations of melody so
primitive as to bring us very near to the beginning of music-making....
I started my investigations with the impression that there might be
essential differences in structure between the Indian music and our
own. I studied the Indian music for ten years with the utmost care
and thoroughness of which I was capable. I have failed to find one
single interval in Indian music which we do not use. It is true,
I have often heard Indians sing these intervals out of tune; but
this is a phenomenon by no means confined to savage or uncivilised
races. In every such case, when I was singing with Indians and was
able to get at their real intentions, I have found that they meant
to sing exactly the interval we should sing in their place.... I
have also found that increase of power is almost always accompanied
with increased elevation of pitch, and diminution of intensity with
a lowering of pitch, seemingly without the Indian being aware of
it.... The evidence of the essential unity of all music, from the
most primitive to the most advanced, is cumulative. The Navaho howls
his song to the war gods directly along the line of the major chord;
Beethoven makes the first theme of his great ‘Eroica’ symphony out of
precisely the same material. The Tigua makes his ‘Dance of the Wheel’
out of a major chord, and its relative minor; Wagner makes Lohengrin
sing ‘Mein lieber schwan’ to a melody composed of exactly the same
ingredients. In short there is only one kind of music in the world.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account