The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
tongue were sufficient to establish entire new sets of words. These
separations were apt to occur frequently when methods of subsistence
were crude and difficult, migrations frequent, and population sparse.
As races developed memory grew to better proportions, and after the
introduction among the Amerinds of mnemonic records and other memory
devices their languages became more crystallised, till within the later
centuries changes have come about slowly. That many more languages
once existed on the American continents than we have any trace of is,
therefore, probable. By intercourse, by intermingling, by the crossing
and absorbing of stocks was finally produced what we find to-day, or
did find yesterday, a reduced number of different stocks, but still
so many that the archæologist views the field with amazement, and the
layman looks upon it with incredulity.
[Illustration: TERRA COTTA STOOL, CHIRIQUI]
[Illustration: ALTAR Q, COPAN, HONDURAS
From photograph by M. H. Saville, Museum of Natural History
]
And these Amerind languages are as remarkable for their separation in
a body from the Old World languages as they are in their separation
from each other. This in itself seems to bestow upon the Amerind people
a vast antiquity in their isolation from other peoples, and adding
to it the testimony of their art works, their implements, and their
pictographs and hieroglyphs, there seems to be no escape from granting
them to be a division of mankind by themselves.
Not only does the differentiation of the stock languages indicate
antiquity, but that of the dialects adds strong testimony. Brinton
cites Dr. Stohl’s opinion that “the difference which is presented
between the Cakchiquel and the Maya dialects could not have arisen in
less than 2000 years.”[20]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account