The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the raceDellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
History
The North-Americans of yesterday : $b a comparative study of North-American Indian life, customs, and products, on the theory of the ethnic unity of the race
Dellenbaugh, Frederick Samuel
Indians of Mexico; Indians of North America
say “s” before “k” or hard “c.” In trying to pronounce “school” they
say “cool.” There is no “r” in Huron, Mexican, Otomi, and some other
languages, and several have no “i.” The Iroquois have no labials, and
do not articulate with their lips. Cherokee has the same peculiarity,
as it is an Iroquoian language. The Karankawa contains sounds rarely
heard in European languages, while other sounds common to the latter
are absent altogether from the Karankawa, so that in this language is
found not only a complete difference from European tongues in grammatic
structure and lexical elements, but a complete difference in phonetics
as well, and in the last respect it differs also from other Amerind
languages. Altogether the Karankawa shows many peculiarities, and it is
unfortunate that the authentic material relating to it is so limited.
In the Navajo there is a common combination of “tl” with a peculiar
explosive click.[33] The tongue is placed with the tip against the roof
of the mouth and pressure as for “t” made against it, the “l” sound
immediately following by an explosion at the side. It is a peculiar
sound, and the Navajo language is filled with it.[34]
[Illustration: AMERIND LINGUISTIC MAP OF NORTH AMERICA, AFTER THE ONE
PREPARED BY THE U. S. BUREAU OF ETHNOLOGY]
In recording these Amerind languages and their peculiar sounds, no
definite system was employed till recently. Travellers wrote the
Amerind words down with ordinary letters as they understood them, thus
producing great diversity in method and results. Differences are due
sometimes to a lack of perception on the part of the recorder, and
also sometimes to a difference in pronunciation on the part of the
Amerinds themselves, and again to differences of methods of recording.
To catch the exact sounds of a new language requires a musical ear.
I do not mean a knowledge of music, but an ear that follows a tune
easily. Without such an ear a person is not fit to record language
sounds that are novel no matter how good a linguist he may be.
Investigators ought to have their ears tested for sound-perception as
the eyes of locomotive engineers are tested for colour.
[Illustration: FAC-SIMILE OF A CHEROKEE MANUSCRIPT
Written in Sequoyah’s Syllabary. See cut on page 52.]
Recognising the importance of a system in the recording of the Amerind
languages—the importance of systematising the orthography of these
languages—the U. S. Bureau of Ethnology published an _Introduction to
the Study of Indian Languages_, in which an alphabet was advocated that
was adapted to recording harmoniously the Amerind languages. In this
over sixty separate sounds are given by signs following as closely as
possible our own alphabet. This is complicated and many investigators
use their own systems and translate afterwards into the more general
one. The great difference in the Amerind sounds necessitates many
different characters and inverted letters standing for peculiar sounds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account