The Ohio Naturalist, vol. II, no. 2, December, 1901Ohio State University. Biological Club
History
The Ohio Naturalist, vol. II, no. 2, December, 1901
Ohio State University. Biological Club
Natural history -- Ohio -- Periodicals; Natural history -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
In recent years there has been a wide demand for the more general
distribution of knowledge of nature, and “nature study” has had a
prominent place in the discussions of educators. I must confess to some
fear for the outcome of well meant efforts to crowd such studies into
the hands of unprepared teachers, though surely no one could wish more
heartily for a wider extension of such work well done. It is encouraging
to note steady progress in this line and we should be content not to
push ahead faster than conditions will warrant.
Our science is an evergrowing one, and I wish to mention briefly some of
the conditions of biological research and the conditions essential to
its successful prosecution. The time has passed when it is possible for
the isolated individual to accomplish much of anything of value in the
growth of science. Such instances as the cobbler naturalist can not well
be repeated under present conditions, and biological workers must expect
that some part at least of their time is spent where libraries, museums
and scientific workers are to be found. I recall meeting some years ago
in an obscure little village, with a young man who was following a
trade, but whose ardent love for nature had brought him to take up the
study of a certain group of insects, and in this group he had conceived
the idea of preparing a work covering the geographical distribution for
the world. With scarcely the beginning of a library, with no access to
general collections, apparently with no conception of the stupendous
nature of the task he was so ambitiously undertaking, there was perhaps
little danger of his discovering the hopelessness of his case. He
doubtless gained much pleasure and individual profit in the quest, but
for the progress of science, how futile such attempts. Isolated work is
often necessary, often the only way in which certain data can be
secured, but if isolation be permanent, if it means to be cut off from
the records of what has already been done in one’s line of study,
progress is painfully slow and results of little value. Access then to
the world’s storehouses of knowledge, to libraries and museums where one
may determine the conditions of progress on any given problem is an
imperative condition to satisfactory research.
Another condition almost as imperative is time for extended and
consecutive work. There are comparatively few places where, after
passing the stages of preparation, one may have the opportunity to give
uninterrupted time to pure research, but fortunately such opportunities
are increasing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account