The Ohio Naturalist, vol. II, no. 2, December, 1901Ohio State University. Biological Club
History
The Ohio Naturalist, vol. II, no. 2, December, 1901
Ohio State University. Biological Club
Natural history -- Ohio -- Periodicals; Natural history -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
As an inspiration to the general student the field of biology has always
held an important place, and in these modern times its fascination is as
potent as ever. Men have attacked the problems of life from many
different viewpoints with greatly different aim and great difference in
preparation and method in their work. Some of these have sought merely
for inspiration for literary effort, but so far as their records have
been exact and truthful they are contributions to science, when mixed
with “vain imaginings” they become literature and not science, although
their right to rank here may depend on literary merit. Every gradation
from pure fiction to pure science may be found and every grade of
literary merit as well. White and Goldsmith, Wood and Figuier, Kipling
and Seton-Thompson, with many others that could be cited, illustrate
this wide divergence among writers who have written to the entertainment
and the greater or less profit of their readers. The value of such works
as these is rather hard to estimate, especially from the scientific
standpoint and particularly when one is under the hallucination of a
beautiful piece of literary creation. They furnish entertainment and
cultivate imagination, some of them stimulate observation and awaken an
interest in nature, but unfortunately many of them contain so much that
is inexact or erroneous that they may sadly encumber the minds of their
readers.
But I would like to call attention here to what appears to me a
fundamental condition of scientific work and thereby a necessary result
of scientific training. Science is naught if not exact. Accurate
observation, accurate record, accurate deduction from data, all of which
may be reduced to simple, plain honesty. Anything else is error, not
science. It is not that “honesty is the best policy,” but that in
science honesty is the only possible policy. Hence, scientific training
should give to every student this one at least of the cardinal virtues,
and we may claim with justice this advantage as one of the results to be
derived from pursuing scientific studies. In fact the relation of
science and biological science, no less than any other, to general
schemes of education, has been one of its most important contributions
to humanity.
Biology has influenced modern education both in the matter taught and
the method of its presentation. It has gone farther and farther into the
mysteries of nature and opened up wider fields of knowledge. It has
insisted that the student should be trained not only in the facts and
the accurate interpretation of facts, but in the methods by which facts
may be obtained, thus providing for the continuous growth of the
substance from which its principles may be verified and definite
conclusions reached.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account