English drama -- Early modern and Elizabethan, 1500-1600 -- History and criticism
that makes it precious, even with those who perhaps undervalue its
sentiment, to Gray’s exquisite sense of the value of vowel sounds.
Let us, however, come down to what is within the reach and under
the control of talent and of a natural or acquired dexterity. And
such a thing is the plot or arrangement of a play. In this part of
their business our older playwrights are especially unskilled or
negligent. They seem perfectly content if they have a story which
they can divide at proper intervals by acts and scenes, and bring at
last to a satisfactory end by marriage or murder, as the case may be.
A certain variety of characters is necessary, but the motives that
compel and control them are almost never sufficiently apparent. And
this is especially true of the dramatic motives, as distinguished
from the moral. The personages are brought in to do certain things
and perform certain purposes of the author, but too often there seems
to be no special reason why one of them should do this or that more
than another. They are servants of all work, ready to be villains or
fools at a moment’s notice if required. The obliging simplicity with
which they walk into traps which everybody can see but themselves, is
sometimes almost delightful in its absurdity. Ben Jonson was perfectly
familiar with the traditional principles of construction. He tells us
that the fable of a drama (by which he means the plot or action) should
have a beginning, a middle, and an end; and that “as a body without
proportion cannot be goodly, no more can the action, either in comedy
or tragedy, without his fit bounds.” But he goes on to say “that as
every bound, for the nature of the subject, is esteemed the best that
is largest, till it can increase no more; so it behoves the action in
tragedy or comedy to be let grow till the necessity ask a conclusion;
wherein two things are to be considered--first, that it exceed not the
compass of one day; next, that there be place left for digression and
art.” The weakness of our earlier playwrights is that they esteemed
those bounds best that were largest, and let their action grow till
they had to stop it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account