The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“It is forbidden to a man to teach his slave the law.” But, alas, the
passage of the Word of God which forbids it, is not referred to. It is
only an inference from the passage, “Ye shall teach your _sons_;” but is
evidently contrary to the whole tenour of the law of Moses. In the first
place, the Israelite who had been sold by the tribunal, or who, on
account of poverty, had sold himself, was still an Israelite, and did
not forfeit, finally, his right to his inheritance in the land; how,
then, could he forfeit his right to the law, which Moses gave as “the
inheritance of the congregation of Jacob?” The law of Moses expressly
provides a day of rest “for the man servant and the maid servant,” that
they may not only have rest for their bodies, but may have time to learn
the will of God, and provide for that eternity to which they are
hastening as well as their masters. Indeed, if meditation on the Word of
God was more necessary for one Israelite than another, it was for the
Hebrew servant. If he had been guilty of theft, and had been sold by the
tribunal, he had special need of instruction in the law of God to lead
him to repentance, and to teach him his duty for the future. If he had
been guilty of no crime, but had been compelled by poverty to sacrifice
his liberty, surely he needed the consolation which the Word of God can
supply, to enable him to bear his hard lot with patience, and to prevent
him from murmuring. But here the oral law steps in, and actually
prohibits his master from teaching him; and instead of encouraging him
in his leisure time to turn to the Word of God as his refuge and his
comfort, it tells him that he is not bound to study it. Here, again, the
New Testament is much more like the law of Moses, which breathes, all
through, a spirit of the most tender compassion for those in servitude.
Moses commands the Israelites to remember that they had themselves been
bondmen in Egypt. The New Testament reminds Christian masters that they
have a master in heaven. “Ye masters, do the same things unto them,
forbearing threatening: knowing that your master also is in heaven;
neither is there respect of persons with him.” (Ephes. vi. 9.) It also
plainly teaches that the relation which exists between believing masters
and servants is, before God, that of brethren. “And they that have
believing masters, let them not despise them, because they are brethren;
but rather do them service because they are faithful and beloved,
partakers of the benefit.” (1 Tim. vi. 2.) Yea, the New Testament lays
down a general principle, the very opposite of that, that “women, and
slaves, and children are exempt from the study of the law.” It says,
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there
is neither male nor female, for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” (Gal.
iii. 28.) It does not dispense men from their relative duties, nor
deprive any of their legitimate privileges, but teaches that for all,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account