The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
But, secondly, the assertion that man has merits is contradicted by the
plain testimonies of Scripture. If man have merits, however few, then so
far as those merits are concerned, his nature must be good and holy, but
God declares the contrary: “Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints;
yea the heavens are not clean in his sight: how much more abominable and
filthy is man, which drinketh iniquity like water.” (Job xv. 15, 16.)
Such language cannot be applied to any creature capable of meriting
anything in the sight of God. Again, if man have merits, his merits must
proceed from the good things which he has done. He that does nothing
good cannot be meritorious, but yet God says, “There is none that doeth
good, no, not one. They are all gone aside, they are all together become
filthy; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.” (Ps. xiv. 1-3.) If
this be true, then no man has merits. If man have merits, they must
proceed from an inherent good principle in his nature, but God says even
of Israel that were is no such principle of good: on the contrary, he
declares that “the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. From
the sole of the foot, even unto the head, there is no soundness in it:
but wounds, and bruises, and putrefying sores.” (Isaiah i. 5, 6.) Here
God describes Israel, and the description is generally true of mankind,
as totally corrupt. There is no soundness in it. The intellect is
corrupt, for “the whole head is sick.” The affections are corrupt, for
“the whole heart is faint.” How, then, can he that has a perverted
intellect and a corrupt heart have merits? Again, if man have merits,
his good deeds, whatever they be, must be such as to deserve the
approbation of God; but the confession of the prophet is—
ונהי כטמא כלנו וכבגד עדים כל צדקותינו ׃
“But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousness as filthy
rags.” (Isa. lxiv. 6.) Either, then, the oral law or the Bible says what
is false. The Bible says that the very best of man’s deeds, “all his
righteousnesses,” are no better in the sight of God than filthy rags: if
this be true, then man has no merit whatsoever.
But again, the assertion that every man has merits and sins, is based
upon a false principle. It takes for granted that God judges men by
their individual acts, and not by the state of their hearts; that is,
that he judges as we do. When we consider a man’s conduct, we can only
look at his acts, and to us some of them appear good and others bad. In
our sight, therefore, he may have some merits and some demerits. But God
looks at the heart, and sees whether a man loves him or not, and by the
whole habit of his mind and affections judges the man’s state and all
his actions. We short-sighted creatures judge a man’s heart by his
actions; but God judges his actions by his heart, and where the heart is
wrong, he is so far from counting any actions as meritorious, that he
looks upon the whole conduct as one mass of abominable sin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account