The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
We showed in our last number that the first axiom of the. oral law
respecting the mode of justification is false. Moses requires perfect
and universal obedience to all the commandments as the condition of
justification and life, whereas the oral law says it is sufficient if a
man’s merits exceed his sins. One of the two, then, has spoken
falsehood. It is for the Jews to consider which of them they will brand
with the character of liar. As for ourselves, we believe that Moses
spoke the truth, and by his standard of right and wrong we proceed to
examine the second and third principles of Rabbinic justification. The
oral law tells us, further, that when God weighs the merits and the
offences, “This weighing is made not with respect to the number of the
merits and the sins, but according to their greatness. There is a merit
which may outweigh many sins, as it is said, ‘Because in him there is
found some good thing.’ (1 Kings xiv. 13.) And there are sins which may
outweigh many merits, for it is said, ‘One sinner destroyeth much good.’
(Ecclesiast. ix. 18.)” And for this reason we are told that “In the ten
days between the New Year and the Day of Atonement, Israel abounds in
almsgiving and good works more than in all the year besides.” Such is
the hope which the oral law holds out to Israel. It first tells a man,
that if his merits exceed his sins, he is safe. Then feeling that none
but a fool or madman can dream of his merits exceeding his sins, it
tries to quiet the conscience by assuring the guilty, that the quality
of the deeds is regarded more than their number, and that there may be
one meritorious act which will outweigh many sins. It endeavours to
prove this by a citation from the Book of Kings. This is in itself
suspicious. Why did it not bring one or more plain passages from the
Books of Moses? They contain the law of God, and the great principles of
God’s judgment. In determining a case like this, an appeal to the letter
of the law is absolutely necessary. Let every Israelite, then, before he
trusts his salvation to the oral law, find out one passage in the law of
Moses, where Moses himself declares that “one merit may outweigh many
sins.” We know not of one similar declaration, and therefore hesitate
not to say, that whosoever rests his salvation on this hope, has
apostatized from the religion of Moses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account