The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
When, at the close of the fifteenth century, the Jews were driven out of
Spain, some of the magnanimous exiles, who had preferred loss of all
things to a compulsory change of religion, arrived at the frontiers of
Portugal, and there sought an asylum. A permanent abode was refused, and
a temporary sojourn was granted them on two conditions—1st, That each
should pay a certain quantity of gold for his admission; and 2dly, That
if they were found in Portugal after a certain day, they should either
consent to be baptized, or be sold for slaves.[12] Now Jews of every
degree and shade of religious belief will agree with us, that these
conditions were most disgraceful to those who imposed them. To refuse
gratuitous assistance to the poor and needy, merely because they had
been brought up in a different religious faith, was utterly unworthy of
those professing faith in Divine revelation. To compel the unfortunate
to choose between loss of liberty or of conscience was the act of a
fiend. But now suppose that the Portuguese had endeavoured to persuade
these poor exiles that their conduct, however base it might appear, was
commanded by God himself. Suppose, further, that when called upon to
prove that this command was from God, they had confessed that no such
command was to be found in the written books of their religion, that it
was only a tradition of their oral law, do you think that the Jewish
exiles would have been satisfied with such proof, and submitted? Would
they not, in the first place, have questioned the authority of a command
resting merely upon uncertain tradition? And would they not have argued,
from the detestable nature of the command itself, that it could not
possibly emanate from the God of truth and love? We ask you then to
apply these principles to תורה שבעל פה the oral law. The Portuguese
refused to perform an act of humanity to the unfortunate Jewish exiles,
unless they were paid for it. Your oral law, as we showed in our last
number, forbids you to give medical advice to a sick idolater
gratuitously. The Portuguese voluntarily undertook to convert the Jews
by force. Your oral law teaches compulsory conversion as a Divine
command. If the oral law could be enforced, liberty of conscience would
be at an end. Neither Jew nor Gentile would be permitted to exercise the
judgment, which God has given him. His only alternative would be
submission to Rabbinic authority, or death. The dreadful command to
kill, by any means, those Israelites who have become epicureans, or
idolaters, or apostates, is well known,[13] and sufficiently proves that
the oral law recognises no such thing as liberty of conscience in
Israel. It pronounces a man an apostate if he denies its Divine
authority, and demands his life as the penalty. The execution of this
one command would fill the world with blood and horror; and recall all
the worst features of inquisitorial tyranny. Not now to mention those
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account