The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets — John Shaqi
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
2dly, As God has given no command to propagate religion by the sword, so
neither has He given any countenance to such doctrine, by the
instrumentality which He has employed for the preservation of religion
in the world. He did not choose a mighty nation of soldiers as the
depositories of his truth, nor any of the overturners of kingdoms for
his prophets. If it had been his intention to convert the world by force
of arms, Nimrod would have been a more suitable instrument than Abraham,
and the mighty kingdom of Egypt more fitted for the task than the family
of Hebrew captives. But by the very choice He showed, that truth was to
be propagated by Divine power working conviction in the minds of men,
and not by physical strength. It would have been just as easy for him to
have turned every Hebrew captive in Egypt into a Samson, as to turn the
waters into blood; and to have sent them into the world to overturn
idolatry by brute force; but He preferred to enlighten the minds of men
by exhibiting a series of miracles, calculated to convince them of his
eternal power and Godhead. When the ten tribes revolted, and fell away
into idolatry, He did not employ the sword of Judah, but the voice of
his prophets, to recall them to the truth. He did not compel them, as
the oral law would have done, to an outward profession, but dealt with
them as with rational beings, and left them to the choice of their
hearts. Nineveh was not converted by Jewish soldiers, but by the
preaching of Jonah. So far is God from commanding the propagation of
religion by the sword, that He would not even suffer a man of war to
build a temple for his worship. When David thought of erecting a temple,
the Lord said unto him, “Thou hast shed blood abundantly, and hast made
great wars; thou shalt not build an house unto my name, because thou
hast shed much blood upon the earth.” (1 Chron. xxii. 8.) Thus hath God
shown his abhorrence of compulsory conversion, and in all his dealings
confirmed his Word, “Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit, saith
the Lord of hosts.” (Zech. iv. 6.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account