The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
“Rabba and Rabbi Zira made their Purim entertainment together. When
Rabba got drunk, he arose and killed Rabbi Zira. On the following day he
prayed for mercy, and restored him to life. The following year Rabba
proposed to him again to make their Purim entertainment together, but he
answered, ‘Miracles don’t happen every day.’” (Talmud, Tr. Megillah,
fol. 7, col. 2.) This history of one of the men who are authorities for
the above Talmudic command to get drunk, plainly illustrates its
meaning, and shows that the Talmud meant and commanded its followers to
drink wine to excess on this occasion. It sets before them the example
of one of the greatest Rabbies committing murder in his drunkenness, and
so far from reprobating this sin, it gravely tells us that God
interposed by a miracle to prevent the ill-consequences; and that the
Rabbi, far from being cured of his propensity, or making any declaration
of his intention to amend, continued in that state of mind, that his
colleague found it imprudent to trust himself at his table. Now every
body that is acquainted with the Jews, knows that they are a temperate
and sober people; and because they are so, we ask them whether the above
command can be from God? and whether they believe that the Talmud speaks
truth in giving the above narrative? It says not merely that men may get
drunk with impunity, but that to get drunk is an act of piety, and
obedience to a command! Here, again, the Talmud is directly at issue
with the New Testament, which says, “Be not drunk with wine, wherein is
excess.” (Ephes. v. 18.) “Take heed to yourselves, lest _at any time_
your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and _drunkenness_, and the
cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares.” (Luke xxi.
34.) The New Testament holds out to us no hope, that if in our
drunkenness, we should commit murder, a miracle will be wrought in order
to deliver us from the consequences; but tells us, that “neither
murderers nor drunkards shall inherit the kingdom of God.” (1 Cor. vi.
9, 10.) Now which of these two doctrines is the most agreeable to the
revealed will of God? How would you desire to meet death, if death
should come upon the feast of Purim? Would you wish the angel of death
to find you, in obedience to the oral law, insensible from overmuch
wine? or in that state of sobriety and thoughtfulness prescribed by
Jesus of Nazareth? Does not the inward tribunal of the heart decide that
Jesus of Nazareth is right, and that the Talmud is wrong? And does not
the Old Testament confirm the sentence? Isaiah says, “Woe unto them that
rise up early in the morning, that they may follow strong drink; that
continue until night, till wine inflame them! and the harp and the viol,
the tabret and pipe, and wine are in their feasts; but they regard not
the work of the Lord, neither consider the operation of his hands.
Therefore my people are gone into captivity, because they have no
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account