The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophetsMcCaul, Alexander
Religion
The old paths, or the Talmud tested by Scripture: Being a comparison of the principles and doctrines of modern Judaism with the religion of Moses and the prophets
McCaul, Alexander
Judaism -- Works to 1900
כל המזלזל בנטילת ידים בא לידי עניות ׃ ואמר ר׳ זריקא אמר ר׳ אלעזר כל
המזלזל בנטילת ידים נעקר מן העולם ׃
“Every one who despises washing of hands sinks into poverty. R. Zerika
says, in the name of R. Eliezer, Every one that despises the washing of
hands is rooted out of the world.” (Orach Chaiim., ibid.) Such is the
toleration of the oral law towards Jews, accused of no breach of God’s
commandment, convicted of no denial of God’s Word, guilty of no crime.
And yet these same men, who are strict even to persecution about one of
their own institutions, allow that which they consider the Word of God
to be transgressed with impunity, if it be expedient. They assert their
belief, that the law of Moses forbids the Jews to have clothing, like
that of the Gentiles, to shave or to wear their hair like the other
nations, and yet they say the transgression of this Divine command is
lawful under the following circumstances:—
ישראל שהיה קרוב למלכות וצריך לישב לפני מלכיהם והיה לו גנאי לפי שלא ידמה
להם הרי זה מותר ללבוש במלבושיהן ולגלח בנגר פניו כדרך שהן עושין ׃
“An Israelite who is near to Royalty, and is obliged to sit before
Gentile kings, and for whom it would be disgraceful not to be like them,
is allowed to dress and to shave as they do.” (Hilchoth Accum., xi. 3.)
But it is not to be wondered at, that those should lightly esteem the
Word of God, who are capable of confounding the guilt of transgressing a
mere human ceremony with the guilt of transgressing a Divine command.
The Talmud makes the sin of neglecting this command as great as that of
gross immorality.
כל האוכל לחם בלא נטילת ידים כאלו בא על אשה זונה וכו׳ ׃
“Every one who eats bread without washing of hands, is as guilty as if
he had committed fornication.” (Sotah, fol. iv., col. 2.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account