The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
The gradual loss of the districts south of Damascus in all probability
followed. A letter from Mut-Addu (the only one from him) to Yanḫamu speaks
of the cities of the land of Garu (identified—though the identification is
not quite satisfactory—with the Heb. Gur), namely Udumu (identified by
Petrie with Adamah, though the form does not agree so well as might be
wished, and Udumu is the usual way of rendering the word Edom, which is
referred to in the cuneiform inscriptions both as a land and a city),
Aduri (Petrie: et-Tireh), Araru (Petrie: Arareh), Meštu (Petrie: Mushtah),
Magdali (Magdala), Ḫini-anabi (Ain-anab, if rightly identified—there is a
certain difficulty in the word possessing a guttural at the beginning and
not likewise as the first letter of the second component—probably ’Anab,
south-west of Hebron, the Anab of Josh. xi. 21), and Sarki. At this time,
according to the tablet, Hawani and Yabiši (Jabesh) had been captured. It
is probably on account of the occupation of the country by so many hostile
tribes that the protest of Burra-buriaš of Babylonia (see p. 281) was
sent, but it was in all probability exceedingly difficult for the Egyptian
king to afford any protection whatever to the caravans which passed
through the disaffected area.
One of the things which the Tel-el-Amarna letters show very clearly is,
that it must have been very difficult for the Pharaoh to know who were his
friends and who were his enemies among the rulers of the Philistines. The
Amorite Abdi-Aširta and his allies were from the first desirous to throw
off the Egyptian yoke, but this prince at the same time constantly sent
letters to Amenophis IV. protesting his fidelity. Other chiefs who were
hostile to Egypt are Etakama, the sons of Lab’aya, Milkîli, Yapa-Addu,
Zimrêda of Sidon, Aziru, and others. On the king’s side were Namyawaza,
who held Kumidi (Petrie: Kamid-el-Lauz), Rib-Addi, whose chief cities were
Gebal, Beyrout, and Simyra, Zimrêda of Lachish, and Abdi-ṭâba of
Jerusalem. Numbers of chiefs, at first faithful, went over to the enemy
when they saw the success of the league against the foreign power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account