The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
“(People) of the land of Pilište (Philistia), the land of Yaudu (Judah),
the land of Udumu (Edom), the land of Ma’abi (Moab), dwellers by the sea,
bringers of the tribute and the gift of Aššur my lord, (for)
sedition-mongering without measure, and evil, which was against me to
cause hostility, unto Pir’u, king of the land of Muṣri, a prince who could
not save them, they brought their homage-offering, and asked him for aid.
I, Sargina, the true prince, fearing the oath of Lag-gi (= Nebo) and
Merodach, keeper of the commands of the god Aššur, caused (my troops) to
cross the Tigris and the Euphrates at high water, the fulness of the
flood, as on dry land. And he, Yawani, their king, who trusted to his own
power, and had not submitted to my dominion, heard from afar of the march
of my expedition, and the glory of Aššur, my lord, overthrew him, and ...
of the region of the river ... depth of the waters ... possession (?) of
his land ... afar ... he fled ... Asdudu....”
In this, too, there is a reference to Pir’u, here called king of Muṣrí,
either Egypt, or that mysterious and otherwise unknown kingdom to whose
help so many trusted.
The years 710 and 709 B.C. were devoted to the operations against
Merodach-baladan, the Chaldean prince who had made himself master of
Babylonia. This is the Merodach-baladan who is referred to in 2 Kings xx.
12, but as his embassy really belongs to a somewhat later date, reference
will be made to it in its place. Suffice it here to say that he was a
usurper on the Babylonian throne, head of the Chaldean tribe called
Bît-Yakîn, and one of the most influential chieftains of the district. To
all appearance, the Babylonians themselves (as in earlier days when they
tried to seize the throne) preferred the Assyrians to the semi-barbarous
Chaldeans and Arameans, with whom they were, in fact, in too close
connection to have any great respect for. It is needless to say that this
entirely fell in with the ambition of the kings of Assyria, who, from the
time of Tukulti-Ninip, if not earlier, had desired, and sometimes
obtained, dominion over Babylonia. Sargon, the successor of two kings of
Assyria who were acknowledged to be at the same time kings of Babylonia,
naturally regarded himself as inheriting that crown in virtue of his being
king of Assyria, whilst the Babylonians themselves were probably not
displeased with the idea that they formed part of the world-renowned and
powerful Assyrian empire, whose kings spoke the same language as
themselves, and with whose religion they were in sympathy. Thus it
happened, therefore, that in the course of the operations against
Merodach-baladan, success frequently crowned the arms of the Assyrians,
and the inhabitants of Babylon, sending to Dûr-Ladinna, where Sargon was
staying, brought him in solemn possession to Babylon, where he made the
prescribed offerings to the gods, took up his abode in Merodach-baladan’s
palace, and received the tribute of the Babylonian tribes which he had
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account