The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and BabyloniaPinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Religion
The Old Testament in the Light of the Historical Records and Legends of Assyria and Babylonia
Pinches, Theophilus G. (Theophilus Goldridge)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
The _kiškanû_ was of three kinds, white (_piṣu_), black (_ṣalmi_), as in
the description of the tree of Paradise, and grey or blue (_sâmi_). In
view of there being these three colours, it would seem that they refer
rather to the fruit of the tree than to the tree itself. Now the only
plant growing in the country and having these three colours of fruit, is
the vine. Of course, this raises the question whether (1) the _kiškanû_ is
a synonym of _gištin_ or _karanu_, or (2) the word _gištin_, which is
generally rendered “vine,” is, in reality, correctly translated. Whatever
be the true explanation, one thing is certain, namely, that in the
description of Paradise, the word black or dark (_ṣalmu_), applied to the
tree there mentioned, cannot refer to the tree itself, for that is
described as being like “white lapis” (_uknū êbbu_), a beautiful stone
mottled blue and white.
[Plate III A.]
Babylonian Mythological Composition. Impression of a cylinder-seal showing
a male figure on the right and a bull-man on the left, holding erect bulls
by the horns and tails. In the centre is a form of the sacred tree on a
hill. Date about 2500 B.C. British Museum.
[Plate III B.]
Babylonian Mythological Composition. Impression of a cylinder-seal showing
Istar, goddess of love and of war as archeress, standing on the back of a
lion, which turns its head to caress her feet. Before her is a worshipper
(priest) and two goats (reversed to form a symmetrical design), leaping.
Behind her is a date-palm. Date about 650 B.C. British Museum.
Among other trees of a sacred nature is “the cedar beloved of the great
gods,” mentioned in an inscription of a religious or ceremonial nature,
though exactly in what connection the imperfectness of the document does
not enable us to see. It would seem, however, that there were certain
priests or seers to whom was confided the “tablet of the gods,” containing
the secret of the heavens and earth (probably the “tablet of fate,” which
Merodach took from the husband of Tiamat after his fight with her for the
dominion of the universe). These persons, who seem to have been the
descendants of En-we-dur-an-ki (the Euedoranchos of Berosus), king of
Sippar, were those to whom was confided “the cedar beloved of the great
gods”—perhaps a kind of sceptre. They had, however, not only to be of
noble race, but also perfect physically and free from every defect and
disease. Moreover, one who did not keep the command of Šamaš and Addu
(Hadad) could not approach the place of Ae, Šamaš, Marduk, and Nin-edina,
nor the number of the brothers who were to enter the seership; they were
not to reveal to him the word of the oracle, and “the cedar beloved of the
great gods” was not to be delivered into his hands.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account