The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper CorrespondentBriggs, Emily Edson
History
The Olivia Letters: Being Some History of Washington City for Forty Years as Told by the Letters of a Newspaper Correspondent
Briggs, Emily Edson
United States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1933; Washington (D.C.) -- History
In 1836, or nearly half a century ago, the beaux in Congress
concluded it would be a good thing to have bouquets fashioned for
their buttonholes at the public expense. Flowers in those primitive
days were obtained with much trouble and expense, so the initiatory
steps to free flowers was taken by an appropriation of $5,000 to be
used in this way: “For conveying the surplus water of the Capitol
to the Botanic Garden, making a basin, and purchasing a fountain
from Hiram Powers.” Before the year was ended it was found that
$5,000 would not relieve the Capitol of its surplus water, and
an additional appropriation was made the same year of $3,614.04.
From 1836 to May, 1850, nothing was taken from the public funds
for flowers. In place of nosegays to titillate the Congressional
nostrils these rough old forefathers used snuff, but this was
also provided at Government expense and the modest snuff-boxes on
either side of the Vice-President’s chair, and those to be found
in the House, will remain for all time as simple reminders of the
habits of our modest ancestors in comparison to the ravages of the
Congressional greenhouses as they stand in the pillory of public
opinion to-day. With the departure of dear old Thurman the last of
the old-time snuff-takers disappears. The last wave of his ancient
bandana heralds the Senatorial coming of one of the most aggressive
movers on the stronghold of all the appropriations. In 1850, $5,000
was taken from the public funds and in 1851, $750 only. A rest came
here until 1855, when $1,500 was taken to build a house in which to
store the plants brought from Japan, and during the same year $12,000
was taken at one time and $3,000 at another to fix up the grounds
of the Botanic Garden and put them in proper order. In 1856 the
grounds still wanted to be fixed to the amount of $5,650 at one time
and $11,000 at another of the same year, and the “grounds” hardly a
scant half-dozen acres in extent; in fact, only two squares long,
but not two whole squares deep. Following up the official figures it
is found that $6,000 more was expended on the Botanic Garden, taken
from another appropriation, making for the year 1856, $22,650. This
it was claimed was paid for “draining the grounds in the vicinity
of the national greenhouses.” In 1857--$2,600 at one time, $5,000
at another, but all the same year, and from another appropriation
$3,360, making in all $10,960 for the year 1857. In 1858, $2,600 at
one time, $3,360 at another, making the round sum of $5,960. The
years 1859 and 1860 only required a thousand each for the bouquets,
and during the war, to the credit of Congress let it be recorded, not
a dollar was sunk in the Botanic swamp so far as can be ascertained
in the Congressional records. But in 1866 the rage for flowers broke
out afresh, and it required $2,500 to stop the wound, which continued
when the vast sum of $25,057.90 was required to build the bouquets
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account