The Opening Heavens: or a Connected View of the Testimony of the Prophets and Apostles, Concerning the Opening Heavens, Compared With Astronomical Observations, and of the Present and Future Location of the New Jerusalem, the Paradise of GodBates, Joseph
Religion
The Opening Heavens: or a Connected View of the Testimony of the Prophets and Apostles, Concerning the Opening Heavens, Compared With Astronomical Observations, and of the Present and Future Location of the New Jerusalem, the Paradise of God
Bates, Joseph
Bible -- Prophecies; Paradise; Second Advent
The strongest proof ever been adduced to prove that the earth or Canaan
was the _sanctuary_, is found in Exodus xv: 17. Now what place is this
which the Lord has made to dwell in? The answer is, "in the sanctuary O
Lord, which thy hands have established." Paul says this sanctuary is in
the heavens which the Lord pitched and not man. Heb. viii: 1, 2. The
only other passage for proof of the land is Psalms lxxviii: 54, both of
which go to strengthen the testimony before adduced. "And he brought
them to the border of his sanctuary, even to this mountain which his
right hand had purchased." Does he in either text say that the mountain
is the sanctuary? If I can understand him, he says that the mountain is
the _border_ of his sanctuary; just as Ezekiel has shown where his guide
measured the land, and then said that the sanctuary of the Lord should
be in the midst of it. Now the word _sanctuary_ is mentioned more than
seventy times in the bible, and the whole of them,--with but a few
exceptions, represent it a dwelling place, a building. The Psalmist
says, that the "Lord looked down from his sanctuary from heaven to the
earth." Not to his sanctuary. But let us see what Daniel and the angel
Gabriel called a sanctuary. Dan. viii: 10-12. Is it not plain here that
Popery took away the daily (i. e. destroyed Paganism) by arms or armies
that stood on his (Popery's part, or side)--xi: 31. The taking away his
sanctuary or polluting it is the same; for it would be absurd to say
that the _land_ was taken away, (11 v.) or that by this transaction the
land was _now_ polluted--xi: 31. Now read ix: 17, 19. Is not Daniel
praying for the restoration of old Jerusalem, the city and _sanctuary_
(the temple where God's people worshipped) which had been desolated,
_burnt up_, by the king of Babylon's army, about seventy years before?
(see Jer. lii: 12, 14) and remained a burnt district until the
commandment by Cyrus to Ezra, and afterwards to Nehemiah, to build the
temple and city. Now in answer to this prayer, God immediately
despatched the angel Gabriel from the court of heaven, to give Daniel
"skill and understanding"--22d v. In the 26th verse he informs him that
Messiah shall be cut off, (crucify the Saviour) and the people of the
prince that shall come, shall destroy the city and the _sanctuary_. How
was this accomplished? Josephus who was an eye witness and historian,
informs us that Titus the son of Vespasian, the Emperor of Rome, about
A. D. 70, (five hundred and sixty years after the temple and city had
been rebuilt by Nehemiah) came with his mighty Roman army and took
Jerusalem, and burned up the city and temple (the sanctuary) and it was
soon after "ploughed as a field," (Micah iii: 12) "and not one stone
left upon another." This, then, was the very circumstance, Prince, and
people, alluded to by the angel Gabriel. I believe no one undertakes to
dispute this point.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account